8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
1/43
UNIVERSIT CARLO CATTANEO LIUCFACOLT DI ECONOMIA
Corso di Laurea in Economia Aziendale
Entrepreneurial
Orientation and FirmPerformance
TUTOR: Salvatore Sciascia
Paper di:
Giorgio TomassettiMatr. 11854
Anno Accademico 2010/2011
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
2/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 1
Contents
Acknowledgment .......................... .......................... ........................... .......................... ........ 3
Abstract ............................................................................................................................... 4
Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 5
1. Entrepreneurship ............................ .......................... .......................... ......................... 6
1.1. The Entrepreneurial Mindset ....................... .......................... .......................... .... 6
1.2. Entrepreneurship at the Corporate Level: Corporate Entrepreneurship ................. 7
1.3. Entrepreneurial Orientation (EO) ........................... .......................... .................... 9
1.4. The Role of the Management in creating an Entrepreneurial Organization ......... 15
1.5. The Relationship between EO and Financial Performance ................................. 16
2. Research Design ............................ .......................... .......................... ....................... 18
2.1. Method ............................................................................................................. 18
2.2. Content Analysis ............................. .......................... .......................... .............. 19
2.3. Financial Performance .............................. .......................... .......................... ..... 24
3. Analysis ........................... .......................... .......................... .......................... ........... 25
3.1. EO ROI ............................... .......................... .......................... ....................... 26
3.2. EO ROE .............................. .......................... .......................... ....................... 28
3.3. EO ROS .............................. .......................... .......................... ....................... 30
4. Discussion ................................................................................................................ 32
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
3/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 2
4.1. Results .............................................................................................................. 32
4.2. Conclusion ............................. .......................... .......................... ....................... 35
4.3. Further Research ............................. .......................... .......................... .............. 35
Bibliography ............................. .......................... .......................... .......................... ........... 38
Index of Figures
Figure 1: The five dimensions of EO ............................................. .......................... ........... 10
Figure 2: Ranking of companies based on their EO Index score .......................................... 23
Figure 3: EO Index - ROI ............................ .......................... .......................... ................... 26
Figure 4: EO dimensions ROI................................. ............................... .......................... 27
Figure 5: EO Index - ROE ........................... .......................... .......................... ................... 28
Figure 6: EO dimensions ROE .......................... .......................... .......................... .......... 29
Figure 7: EO Index ROS ............................... .......................... .......................... .............. 30
Figure 8: EO dimensions ROS ........................... .......................... .......................... .......... 31
Figure 9: Autonomy - ROI ............................... .......................... .......................... .............. 34
Index of Tables
Table 1: Word list for EO dimensions............................................ .......................... ........... 21
Table 2: Means and Standard Deviations ........................... .......................... ....................... 22
Table 3: Correlations between dimensions of EO and performance measures ...................... 25
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
4/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 3
Acknowledgment
First and foremost, I would like to thank my family for their support and encouragement.
They have always believed in the importance of my education and for this I will always be grateful.
I would like to express my deep and sincere gratitude to Prof. Salvatore Sciascia for being my
mentor and advisor for this research project. His guidance and assistance have been essential during
the research and writing of this thesis.
Also, special thanks to Joseph R. Erba, professor at the University of North Carolina at
Greensboro (UNCG), for introducing me to the subject of Corporate Entrepreneurship and
providing me with valuable advice. I find his ability to inspire and motivate people extremely
impressive. Finally, I have to thank Dennis P. Leyden, professor at the University of North Carolina
at Greensboro (UNCG), who taught me how to properly write a research paper. Most importantly, I
have to thank Mr. Leyden for his invaluable insights on the art of Critical Thinking.
Prima di tutto, vorrei ringraziare la mia famiglia per il loro supporto e incoraggiamento. A loro sar
sempre grato per aver creduto nellimportanza della mia educazione.
Vorrei inoltre esprimere la mia pi sincera gratitudine a Salvatore Sciascia per aver svolto il ruolo di
tutore. I suoi consigli e il suo aiuto sono stati fondamentali durante il periodo di ricerca e di stesura della
tesi.
Un ringraziamento speciale va a Joseph R. Erba, professore presso University of North Carolina a
Greensboro (UNCG), per avermi introdotto allo studio della Corporate Entrepreneurship e per avermi dato
sempre consigli preziosi. La sua abilit a ispirare e motivare le persone mi ha colpito molto. In conclusione,
devo ringraziare anche Dennis P. Leyden, professore presso University of North Carolina a Greensboro
(UNCG), per avermi insegnato ad affrontare un progetto di ricerca. In particolare, devo ringraziare il
professor Leyden per le sue preziose lezioni sullarte del Pensiero Critico.
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
5/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 4
Abstract
The primary objective of this thesis is to determine whether firms who have a greater
entrepreneurial orientation tend also to be more successful in terms of performance. In particular, I
want to answer the following research question: What is the relationship between the
entrepreneurial orientation and the performance of a firm?. This thesis is the result of a research
project conducted on a set of 49 companies in the Consumer Goods sector listed on Borsa Italiana
(the Italian Stock Exchange) during the year 2010.
The paper is composed of four parts. In the first chapter I introduce the subject of
entrepreneurship. In particular, I describe the main findings and points of view on the topic of
corporate entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial orientation. The research background in the first
chapter allows the reader to gain a better understanding of the second chapter. Indeed, in the second
chapter I describe the tools and the method used in this research project to gather the necessary data.
In the third chapter, I explain the analysis I conducted on the information previously collected.
Finally, the fourth chapter is about the results of my research. In this part of the paper I conclude
that there is a moderate positive correlation between the level of entrepreneurial orientation and a
firms performance and this result is coherent with previous research in the field of corporate
entrepreneurship.
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
6/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 5
Introduction
On September 15, 2008, Lehman Brothers filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. In the
following days it became clear how fast the world was moving. Suddenly, organizations all over the
globe were experiencing serious financial difficulties and in a matter of hours the U.S. financial
system, as well as the world financial system, were under severe risk of collapsing.
Although this paper is not about the recent financial crisis, it is important to realize that
todays business world has gone through some major changes in recent years. The effects of
Lehmans bankruptcy are just an example that helps us realize how fast the world is moving today
and how complex it has become. Indeed, companies need to learn how to successfully deal with a
constantly changing external environment that forces them to continually work on their strategy to
align the internal environment with the external environment.
Many organizations are fully aware of their need to change. Nevertheless, many are unwilling
to do so. As research shows, individuals tend to be risk-adverse and tend to stick with the status quo
(Samuelson & Zeckhauser, 1988). Therefore organizations need to develop strategies that allow
them to embrace change by making it a vital part of their culture. By doing so they reduce the
resistance to change and the whole process becomes easier. As a matter of fact, we have seen many
companies taking actions to exploit opportunities by fostering entrepreneurship (Sathe, 1988;
Russell, 1999). Indeed, as you will read in this thesis, by having an entrepreneurial orientation
companies are able to quickly react to changes happening in the external environment and
ultimately improve their performance.
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
7/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 6
1.EntrepreneurshipIn this first chapter I introduce the reader to concept of entrepreneurial behavior and its main
characteristics. Then I describe the meaning of Corporate Entrepreneurship (CE) and in particular I
expand on the concept of entrepreneurial orientation (EO) and its dimensions, which are a central
element of this paper. Also, in this chapter, I analyze the role of the management in creating an
entrepreneurial organization. Finally, I describe similar research projects that previously tried to
determine the type of relationship that exists between the entrepreneurial orientation of a firm and
its performance.
1.1.The Entrepreneurial MindsetThe entrepreneurial mindset can be described as a way of conducting business operations that
involves a constant risk-taking in order to seize opportunities. Indeed, entrepreneurship has been
proved to be an important wealth creation tool that facilitates innovation, value creation and
renewal (Hitt, Ireland, Camp, & Sexton, 2001). Throughout history many definitions of the word
entrepreneurhave been given. According to Schumpeter, for example, the entrepreneur is a major
agent of economic development, while Kirzner defines the entrepreneur as the one who identifies
potential opportunities that are unexploited and allocates efficiently the resources available on the
market (Sciascia & De Vita, 2004). These definitions help us understand what it really means to be
entrepreneurial.
Although every entrepreneurial organization is different from another, we are still able to
identify some common traits that characterize them. For instance, entrepreneurial organizations
have a high acceptance of failure, which ultimately provides a unique way of approaching
innovation. As Tim Campos, Facebook CIO, recently said, Failure is the critical ingredient to
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
8/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 7
creating an innovative culture (Wall, 2011). The acceptance of failure needs to be promoted by the
management and in particular the so called failure-tolerant leaders need to focus their attention on
promoting a culture of intelligent risk taking by assuming a non-judgmental analytical posture and
admitting their own mistakes.
Another common trait of entrepreneurial cultures is the high level of engagement among the
workers and in particular between the leaders and their teams. Engagement can be achieved, for
example, by encouraging collaboration, showing interest and being supportive to others. It is
interesting to notice that a recent study shows that praising people can actually reduce their
performance, while only a genuine interest in an employees work has positive effects on
performance (Farson & Keyes, 2002).
Finally, it is important to understand that entrepreneurship is both a way of thinking
(cognition) and a way of acting (behavior) (Morris, Kuratko, & Covin, 2010), and for an
entrepreneurial culture to work, a constant flow of relevant information across all levels have to
occur.
After this short introduction to entrepreneurship we can now explore the application of
entrepreneurial principles in the corporate world.
1.2.Entrepreneurship at the Corporate Level: CorporateEntrepreneurship
Entrepreneurship is often associated with small companies and start-ups, but in recent years
we have seen many corporations embrace the principles of entrepreneurship inside their own
organizations. This phenomenon has been labeled Corporate Entrepreneurship (CE) and it has been
defined as the process by which individuals inside organizations pursue opportunities without
regard to the resources they currently control (Stevenson, Roberts, & Grousbeck, 1999) . For
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
9/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 8
instance, successful companies like 3M, Google and IBM strongly encourage their employees to be
entrepreneurial. 3M allows its employees to spend 15% of their time on side project. Similarly
Googles employees can spend 20% of their time pursuing their own projects; products such as
Gmail and Google News are a direct result of this policy. Instead IBM organizes the so called
jams, which are brainstorming sessions that more than 300,000 employees attend. These
initiatives have been very successful (and also profitable) for the companies that have implemented
them (Howe, 2010).
CE can be better understood by describing the three types of concepts in which it can be
expressed (Guth, & Ginsberg, 1990; Covin, & Miles, 1999):
1. The creation of new businesses within an established organization (i.e. corporate venturingor internal innovation)
2. The transformation of organizations through strategic renewal3. Entrepreneurial Orientation (EO)
The firstconcept (corporate venturing or internal innovation) is defined as an activity which
seeks to generate new businesses for the corporation in which it resides through the establishment
of external or internal corporate ventures (Von Hippel, 1977, p. 163). The second concept,
strategic renewal, is the revitalization of the companys operations by changing the scope of its
business, its competitive approach, or both (Zahra, 1996, p. 1715). Finally, the third concept,
entrepreneurial orientation, has been defined by Covin and Miles (1999, p. 48) as an
entrepreneurial philosophy that permeates an entire organizations outlook and operations. In the
literature we find that entrepreneurial orientation is also referred as entrepreneurial management
(Brown, Davidsson, & Wiklund, 2001; Stevenson, & Jarillo, 1990) or entrepreneurial posture
(Covin & Slevin, 1991).
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
10/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 9
In this paper I will focus my attention on this last one of the three concepts described above,
Entrepreneurial Orientation (EO), and I will study the correlation between the EO of an
organization and its financial results. In particular, I will look at a set of companies in the Consumer
Goods sector listed on Borsa Italiana (the Italian Stock Exchange) and analyze their Managements
Discussion and Analysis (MD&A).
The MD&A can be found inside the annual report of a public company and it is supposed to
address the performance of the firm for that year, as well as the significant events, trends,
conditions and contingencies that can affect the future of the firms operations. It should also
include the financial statements, systems and controls, compliance with laws and regulations, and
actions taken or planned to address problems (Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board,
1999).
1.3.Entrepreneurial Orientation (EO)Entrepreneurial orientation has now become a central concept in entrepreneurship and
research on this subject is increasing because it is now recognized by managers and scholars as a
critical success factor (Kaya & Aca, 2009). It is possible to define Entrepreneurial Orientation
(EO) as the set of processes, practices, and decision-making styles of firms that act in an
entrepreneurial way (Lumpkin & Dess, 1996).
A firm can be considered entrepreneurial if it exhibits the following five entrepreneurial
behaviors: autonomy, competitive aggressiveness, innovativeness, proactiveness, and risk taking.
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
11/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 10
Figure 1: The five dimensions of EO
These dimensions are considered to be the key dimensions of EO (Short, Payne, Brigham,
Lumpkin, & Broberg, 2009) and they are essential if an organization wants to engage in successful
CE. Below I will describe each one of the five dimensions to gain a better understanding on what it
really means to have an entrepreneurial orientation. Also, the following five dimensions are used in
this research project to measure the level of EO in each company.
Autonomy
Autonomy refers to the independent actions taken by individuals or teams in order to develop
new opportunities from the idea stage to completion (Lumpkin & Dess, 1996). The ability to freely
think and share opinions is, for instance, a key trait of an entrepreneurial organization. This mindset
Entrepreneurial
OrientationAutonomyCompetitive
aggressiveness
Innovativeness
Proactiveness
Risk taking
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
12/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 11
ultimately translates in a sense of empowerment, which helps employees take an active, rather than
passive, role in the company.
Although the concept of autonomy seems simple to implement, encouraging independent
actions can pose several threats to the organizations if the process is not well managed. It is
therefore extremely important that these autonomous teams/individuals are well coordinated to
reduce the possible waste of resources and the creation of other forms of inefficiencies, such as the
duplication of effort.
Practical actions that can be taken to foster autonomy are:
sunkworks1; management structure that supports and empowers employees, so that they can actively
contribute to the success of the company;
organizational structures that support independent actions.In conclusions, companies need to empower their employees by giving them a sense of
autonomy that should stimulate their creativity and innovativeness while, at the same time, making
sure that these individuals are well coordinated, in order to reduce the possible inefficiencies that a
greater degree of autonomy might cause (Dess, Lumpkin, & Eisner, 2010).
Competitive Aggressiveness
This entrepreneurial behavior refers to the aggressive competitive attitude that some firms
implement to outperform their competitors or to maintain and/or improve their competitive position
in the marketplace. For instance, some companies preannounce their products to discourage
1Sunkworks are groups inside an organization that have a high level of autonomy and typically engage
in creative problem solving.
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
13/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 12
competitors from engaging in similar activities. Competitive aggressiveness can lead to competitive
advantages only if it is used with moderation. As a matter of fact, some companies have seriously
damaged their reputation with their extremely aggressive attitude (Dess, Lumpkin, & Eisner, 2010).
Actions associated with this behavior are for example:
cutting prices; sacrificing profitability to gain market share (Venkatraman, 1989); aggressive spending on marketing, quality, or manufacturing capacity (MacMillan & Day,
1987).
Innovativeness
Innovativeness refers to the willingness to creatively find novel solutions and opportunities
that ultimately lead to the creation of new or improved products/processes.
This dimension of EO is critical in a constantly changing environment. Innovation is indeed a
way for companies to understand the needs and the wants of the market and translate them into
actions that can be taken inside established organizations. The ability to innovate can and should
result in the creation of sustainable competitive advantages. In particular, research shows that
innovations that lead to sustainable competitive advantages usually share four common traits
(Lengnick-Hall, 1992).
They are:
hard to imitate; reflect market realities; allow a firm to exploit the timing characteristics of the industry;
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
14/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 13
rely on readily accessible technologies and capabilities.Although investing in innovation has many potential benefits, it is important to be aware of
the possible pitfalls as well. For instance, R&D expenses might result in a waste of resources,
innovation might not be appropriately protected or competing firms might find a better use of the
technology that your company has developed.
There are several ways to foster innovativeness inside an organization. Few examples are:
encouraging creativity and experimentation with the help of corporate resources;
making a constant investment in R&D to produce new technology and improve existing
products/processes.
In conclusion, an innovative environment has the potential to generate true competitive
advantages and future growth, but it also involves a great deal of risk associated with the fact that
the investments made by the company might not pay off (Dess, Lumpkin, & Eisner, 2010). This is a
compromise that an entrepreneurial organization has to accept.
Proactiveness
Proactiveness can be defined as the ability to anticipate changes in the marketplace or future
needs and problems (Short, Payne, Brigham, Lumpkin, & Broberg, 2009). In other words, it is the
ability to pursue new opportunities. Proactive firms are able to be ahead of their competitors by
constantly monitoring the external environment to spot new trends and needs but, most importantly,
they take action. Also, by being proactive many firms are able to gain what is called first mover
advantage. First movers can usually charge higher prices and quickly gain and maintain a good
market share.
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
15/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 14
Typical ways to express a proactive culture are:
introducing new products or technological capabilities before the competition; constantly seek out new products/services (Dess, Lumpkin, & Eisner, 2010).
However, it is correct to note that first movers are not always successful because they can
encounter resistance from the marketplace or the new product/service might not respond to a real
customer need. Therefore a proactive attitude needs to be sustained by the last one of the five
entrepreneurial behaviors; risk taking.
Risk Taking
Risk taking refers to the willingness to act boldly without knowing the consequences (Dess,
Lumpkin, & Eisner, 2010). As I stated earlier, the ability to take risk to seize opportunities is a
fundamental trait of entrepreneurs that must be embraced by those organizations that pursue an
entrepreneurial orientation. It is possible to distinguish between three types of risk:
business risk: it is related to the decision to invest in new markets or to use new
technologies without knowing the probability of success;
financial risk: is present whenever growth is achieved through heavy borrowing or arelatively big commitment of resources;
personal risk: is taken by an executive when he or she decides to take a stand in favor of aspecific strategic decision.
When talking about risk taking it is important to specify that taking risk should not be
confused with gambling. Indeed, companies should approach risk taking by carefully managing the
level of risk associated with their actions. For instance, decisions should be made with a sufficient
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
16/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 15
level of research and planning with the objective of reducing or at least better defining the level of
risk of a specific course of action.
In conclusion, firms can internalize the principles of entrepreneurial orientation inside their
own organization and this cultural change allows them respond more easily and quickly to the
changes that take place in the external environment. In other words, corporate entrepreneurship
serves as an adaptation mechanism, as Lumpkin and Dess (1996) suggested.
1.4.The Role of the Management in creating an EntrepreneurialOrganization
The implementation of an entrepreneurial orientation inside an established organization can
pose several challenges. In most cases, companies decide to initiate an organizational reorientation
only after a performance crisis that forces them that to take action, especially on their management
team that does not show signs or willingness to make changes. Although this is the most common
behavior in todays marketplace, it is not however the most correct. In fact, the most successful
reorientations occurred when the management initiated the necessary changes before the crisis has
started (Tushman, Newman, & Romanelli, 1986). Therefore we can conclude that, in order for this
implementation to be successful, the role played by the management is critical. Indeed, research
shows that innovative managerial behavior must be displayed and reinforced constantly inside an
organization (Kuratko, Ireland, & Hornsby, 2004). Managers must be able to empower employees
and inspire them on the value of the company so that their performance is maximized. In particular,
managers can:
create an organization that stimulates the creation of entrepreneurial initiatives; provide an entrepreneurial vision that can guide innovation;
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
17/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 16
make sure that promising projects do not lack the necessary resources (Ramachandran,Devarajan, & Ray, 2006).
An entrepreneurial organization needs therefore to make of innovation an accepted and
appropriate way to solve problems, and a firm can do this successfully by creating a shared sense of
purpose in the organization (Roberts, 1984).
Given the critical role played by the management in implementing a culture of
entrepreneurship inside a company, the research that I have conducted has been based on the
analysis of the Managements Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) found inside the annual report that
each company has published for the year 2010. This report is written by the management to give
public notice of how a company is being operated.
1.5.The Relationship between EO and Financial PerformanceIn this section I would like review what has already been written on the relationship between
EO and performance and describe the main findings of this growing field of research. As previously
stated, in this paper I will explore the relationship between the level of EO and the financial results
of a set of Italian public companies.
Previous research has demonstrated that EO may improve performance because it helps
organizations identify promising opportunities, obtaining first mover advantages and targeting
premium market segments (Lumpkin & Dess, 1996). Also, the benefits that EO provides are being
recognized across firm types and managerial levels (Covin, Ireland, & Kuratko, 2003). Corporate
entrepreneurship more in general can improve the growth and the profitability of a company by
increasing the level of proactiveness and willingness to take risk that allows the development of
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
18/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 17
new businesses, as well as new products/services and processes (Ramachandran, Devarajan, & Ray,
2006).
A positive relationship between CE and performance has also been observed by Zahra and
Covin (1995) in their study in which they examined the longitudinal impact of CE on a financial
performance index that took into consideration both growth and profitability information.
However, researchers such as Covin and Slevin (1989), as well as Smart & Conant (1994),
were not able to find a positive relationship between these two elements. In particular, they found
that under certain circumstances EO is less related or even negatively correlated with performance.
This result has been observed in firms that operate in benign environments (Covin & Slevin, 1989).
In conclusion, we can state that it is still debatable whether there is a positive correlation
between EO and performance or not. However, the number of researchers that found a positive
correlation between the two is greater than the number of those who did not find it.
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
19/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 18
2.Research DesignIn this second chapter I describe how I conducted this research project. In particular, I explain
the method used to collect the necessary information and the techniques that allowed me to
elaborate the data in my possession and reach meaningful results.
2.1.MethodAfter researching and studying the existing relevant material on the subject of entrepreneurial
orientation, I had to decide how to conduct some exploratory research to determine the most reliable
and feasible way to reach a meaningful result that would allow me to correctly answer the following
research question:
What is the relationship between the entrepreneurial orientation and the
performance of a firm?
In this preliminary part of my research, the first task I had to perform was finding a method to
determine the level of EO of a firm. In previous research projects on this subject, mainly two
different types of tools have been used to solve this issue. Most researchers have used surveys to
question people inside organizations on their entrepreneurial attitude (Covin & Slevin, 1989), while
other researchers have used content analysis (Short, Payne, Brigham, Lumpkin, & Broberg, 2009).
For this research project I decided to use the content analysis, and I explain the reasons for this
decision later in the paper.
Second, I had to decide on which type of document I could conduct a content analysis. I
looked at a series of annual reports of public Italian companies, and I decided to perform my
research on the Managements Discussion and Analysis (MD&A), mainly for two reasons. First,
MD&As are present in all annual reports of Italian public companies; second, they are written by
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
20/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 19
the management and they indirectly reflect the attitude of the firm and possibly its entrepreneurial
spirit.
For this research I decided to focus on a set of 49 companies of the Consumer Goods sector
listed on Borsa Italiana (the Italian Stock Exchange) during 2010, which is the year I choose for my
research. The sector was formed by 50 companies but I had to exclude one (Aicon Spa) due to the
unavailability of its annual report for 2010.
Finally, to answer the research question, I had to gather some data on performance for the
chosen set of companies. Performance can be expressed with various indicators, both financial and
non-financial. In this research I collected financial measures of performance because they have been
used more widely and they have resulted more appropriate when performance measures were
compared to EO measures (Rauch, Wiklund, Lumpkin, & Frese, 2009). Also, to avoid misleading
results that often self-report data presents, the financial data used in this research is based on
archival data collected from secondary sources.
2.2.Content Analysis
In this section I describe how I conducted the content analysis for this paper, and I explain
the reasoning behind the decision of using this method of research.
As previously stated, the level of entrepreneurial orientation of each firm was found by
performing a content analysis on the MD&As available in the 2010 annual reports. Content analysis
of a narrative text has helped researchers define key strategic decision-making processes (Short &
Palmer, 2003), discover differences among communicators (Weber, 1990) and obtain information
otherwise unavailable. In addition, the use of content analysis has displayed greater reliability and
replicability compared to other techniques (Finkelstein & Hambrick, 1996) and recall biases are
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
21/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 20
avoided (Barr, Stimpert, & Huff, 1992). These are some of the benefits that content analysis can
offer that ultimately led me to choose this tool over other ones available. Most importantly, content
analysis has also been successful in determining the perceptions and beliefs of the authors of a
narrative text (DAveni & MacMillan, 1990). As a matter of fact, one of the main scopes of this
project is being able to determine how entrepreneurial a firm is from the analysis of its MD&A. In
this document the top management gives a description of their view on both the external and the
internal environment, and they also write on the decisions taken, the strategic plans put in place to
meet future goals and the results achieved throughout the year.
In conducting the content analysis for this paper, I build a world list of semantically related
words for each one of the five dimensions of EO described earlier (autonomy, competitive
aggressiveness, innovativeness, proactiveness, and risk taking). In performing this task, I decided to
start from an already existing word list that was first created to conduct a similar research project on
family firms. The original word list can be found in the article Family Firms and Entrepreneurial
Orientation in Publicly Traded Firms: A Comparative Analysis of the S&P 500 (Short, Payne,
Brigham, Lumpkin, & Broberg, 2009). The following reasons led me to use of this word list:
the word list has been based on the EO Lumpkin and Dess definition of EO (1996), fromwhich the five dimensions that I use in this paper are derived;
it was created using on The Synonym Finder, which has been previously used to conductsemiotic analysis;
the words are mutually exclusive and each word is associated with a single EO dimension; the validation process was conducted by using multiple steps to ensure the reliability of the
word list.
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
22/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 21
Finally, I carefully translated the word list from English to Italian with the assistance of
multiple dictionaries. In some cases, due to the ambiguous meaning of some expressions, I had to
add or delete words that otherwise would have created misleading results from the content analysis.
Here is the word list I used:
Table 1: Word list for EO dimensions
Word Lists for EO Dimensions
Dimension Words
Autonomy autogoverno, autonomia, autonomo, autorit, autorizzazione, deregulation, disconnessa,
disconnesso, emancipazione, indipendente, indipendenza, ingovernato, liberalizzazione, libero,libert, non forzato, non governato, non controllato, permesso, permettersi, possibilit, sconfinata,sconfinato, senza affiliazioni, senza governo, senza regole, separato, separata, sovranit, sovrano,
sovrana
Competitive
aggressiveness
aggressivo, aggressivo, ambizione, ambiziosa, ambizioso, antagonista, antagonistico, aspirante,
asta, avversaria, avversario, battaglia, capitalizzare, challenge, combattente, combattere,
combattimento, combattivo, combattivo, competere, competitivo, competitiva, competitor,
competizione, compimento, concorrente, conflitti, conflitto, conquista, contendere, difende,difendere, difendiamo, feroce, gara, gare, gareggiare, giocare, impegnarsi, impegnati, impegnato,
intensificato, intenso, lotta, lotte, lottare, nemici, nemico, opporre, opporsi, opposizione, polemica,
polemici, polemico, pronto a combattere, remare contro, risultati, risultato, rivale, rivali, sfidante,
sfidanti, sforzare, sforzarsi, sfruttare, successi, successo, tornei, torneo
Innovativeness abile, abilit, architettare, brevetti, brevetto, cambiamento, cambiare, cervello, concepire, crea,
creare, creativit, creatore, creazione, creiamo, dotato, esperti, esperto, evocare, fare, formare,formulare, formulazione, genesi, geni, genio, idea, ideare, ideatore, immaginare, immaginati,
immaginativo, immaginato, immaginazione, improvvisare, improvvisati, improvvisato,
ingegnosit, ingegnoso, iniziamo, iniziare, iniziativa, iniziato, iniziatore, iniziatori, innovare,
innovazione, intelligente, intelligenti, intelligenza, inventare, inventato, inventivo, inventore,
invenzione, ispirato, ispirazione, macchinazione, marchi, marchio, nuova, nuove, nuovi, novit,nuovo, originale, originalit, , origine, pensare, pensatore, pensiero, pieno di risorse, prevedere,
progettare, provenire, radicale, riformulare, riprogettare, rivoluzionare, scoperta, scoprire, sognare,
sogno, strutturare, talenti, talento, trasformarsi, trasformata, trasformazione, vision, visionario,
visione, visualizzare
Proactiveness anticipatore, anticipatori, aspettarsi, controllare, controlli, controllo, domanda, domandare,
domande, esplorare, esplorativi, esplorativo, esplorazione, esplorazioni, inchiesta, inchieste,indagine, indagini, investigare, investigazione, opportunit, prevedere, prevediamo, proattiva,
proattivi, proattivo, pronosticare, prospettiva, ricerca, ricerche, sondaggi, sondaggio, sorveglianza,
studi, studio, verifica, verifiche, visionari, visionario
Risk taking audace, audaci, avventarsi, avventata, avventati, avventato, avventura, avventure, avventurosa,
avventurosi, avventurosi, avventuroso, avventuroso, azzardare, azzardati, azzardato, azzardo,
coraggiosa, coraggiosi, coraggioso, impavidi, impavido, imprudenza, incauta, incauti, incauto,incerta, incerti, incerto, intraprendente, osare, pericoli, pericolo, pericoloso, precipitosamente,
probabilit, rischi, rischiare, rischio, rischiosi, rischioso, scommessa, scommesse, scommettere,
senza paura, sfida, sfide, spavalda, spavaldi, spavaldo, temerari, temeraria, temerariet, temerario,
tuffarsi
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
23/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 22
Each MD&A was then scanned to determine the density of each one of the words above. The
quantitative analysis software ATLAS.ti has been used to determine word usage. Computer-aided
content analysis allows us to analyze documents at a faster pace, as well as increase the level of
reliability. In this research the relative frequency of words was determined for each firm in each one
of the five dimensions. Indeed, the presence or the absence of some words, as well as the frequency
with which they appear in a text, allows us to determine the authors mental models (Carley, 1997).
After collecting the data for each dimension, a cumulative score (EO Index) was calculated
for each firm. The EO Index allowed me to compare the general level of entrepreneurial orientation
among the different firms of my set. Indeed, according to Covin and Slevin (1989) EO is a
unidimensional construct and most studies have summed across all dimensions of EO to create a
single variable (Rauch, Wiklund, Lumpkin, & Frese, 2009, p. 22). Finally, as I later explain, this
piece of information was compared to the measures of performance to determine the type of
correlation between the two.
The following table (Table 2) shows the means and the standard deviations for the data
collected during the content analysis on the dimensions of EO.
Table 2: Means and Standard Deviations
Dimension MAX MIN M SD
Autonomy 0.430 0.000 0.087 0.079
Competitive
aggressiveness0.705 0.055 0.282 0.126
Innovativeness 1.109 0.036 0.436 0.229
Proactiveness 0.690 0.000 0.304 0.156
Risk taking 0.963 0.037 0.342 0.230
EO Index 2.140 0.619 1.450 0.395
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
24/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 23
In conclusion, the content analysis allowed me to assign a score, reflective and proportional
to the level of EO, to each one of the 49 companies analyzed. With the resulting scores I then
ranked the firms by their level of entrepreneurial orientation. The following graph shows the
complete ranking:
Figure 2: Ranking of companies based on their EO Index score
While Pirelli and C. Spa and Safilo Group Spa resulted the most entrepreneurial, Le Buone
Societ Spa and Arena Spa turned out to be the least entrepreneurial ones.
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
25/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 24
2.3.Financial PerformanceAs I wrote earlier, I decided to use financial measures of performance available on archival
data. In particular, I used the annual reports for the year 2010 found in each companys website.
Previous studies on EO have usually relied on either growth measures or accounting-based criteria.
When using account-based criteria, financial ratios such as Return on Assets (ROA) and Return on
Investment (ROI) were utilized (Rauch, Wiklund, Lumpkin, & Frese, 2009). To ensure a more
complete set of data, during my research I decided to collect the following financial information:
assets, liabilities, equity, sales, EBIT, net income, net capital invested. Although annual reports and
financial websites often have a list of ratios already calculated, I made the decision to calculate
them myself to ensure consistency and avoid possible errors due to slightly different data and
formulas available.
As I previously explained, I obtained the necessary financial data from the annual reports
available in each companys website. Only in a few cases in which the annual report did not
indicate some needed financial information (i.e. Net Capital Invested), I had to gather the missing
data from financial websites, such as Morningstar.it and Reuters.com. I then calculated the
following financial ratios2:
ROI (Return on Investment) = EBIT / Net Capital Invested ROE (Return on Equity) = Net Income / Equity ROS (Return on Sales) = EBIT / Sales
After determining the financial ratios for each one of the 49 companies selected for this
study, I analyzed the results. The description of the analysis I conduced can be found in the next
chapter.
2Source for the financial ratios formulas: (Cortesi, Furlan, & Tettamanzi, 2008)
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
26/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 25
3.AnalysisThis chapter explores the results of my analysis on the relationship between the measures of
entrepreneurial orientation and the financial performance of the companies selected for this study.
Once all the necessary data was gathered, a correlation analysis was conducted on a series of
dimensions to detect the existing relationships between variables. In particular, in this research I
analyzed the correlation between each one of the five EO dimensions (autonomy, competitive
aggressiveness, innovativeness, proactiveness, and risk taking), including also the EO Index3, and a
measure of financial performance. As previously stated, the measures of financial performance used
in this study are ROI, ROE and ROS.
The following sections of this chapter are dedicated to the presentation of the results of the
correlation analyses that I conducted4. The graphical and numerical results will then be evaluated.
Table 3: Correlations between dimensions of EO and performance measures
Dimension ROI ROE ROS
Autonomy -.104 .102 -.380
Competitive
aggressiveness.171 .058 .343
Innovativeness .139 .162 .242
Proactiveness .246 .168 .104
Risk taking .042 .060 .185
EO Index .236 .235 .323
3EO Index is a cumulative score that reflects the level of entrepreneurial orientation inside an
organization. It is calculated as the sum of the individual scores for each one of the five dimensions of EO.
More information is available on chapter 2.2.4
The software Tableau Public was used to create the graphs and calculate the statistical information
presented in this following pages.
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
27/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 26
3.1.EO ROIThe following graph shows the correlation between the entrepreneurial orientation of a firm
and its Return on Investment (ROI).
Figure 3: EO Index - ROI
Number of observations: 49DF (degrees of freedom): 2Residual DF: 47
SSE (sum squared error): 0.0007059MSE (mean squared error): < 0.0001
R-Squared: 0.0557311Standard error: 0.0038754p (significance): 0.102462
Individual trend lines:Pane(r,c) p Equation
(1,1) 0.102462 EO INDEX = 0.00608314*ROI + 0.0140291
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
28/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 27
Figure 4: EO dimensions ROI
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
29/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 28
3.2.EO ROEThe following graph shows the correlation between the entrepreneurial orientation of a firm
and its Return on Equity (ROE).
Figure 5: EO Index - ROE
Number of observations: 49DF (degrees of freedom): 2Residual DF: 47SSE (sum squared error): 0.0007064
MSE (mean squared error): < 0.0001
R-Squared: 0.0551137Standard error: 0.0038767p (significance): 0.10444
Individual trend lines:Pane(r,c) p Equation
(1,1) 0.10444 EO INDEX = 0.00179466*ROE + 0.0146985
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
30/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 29
Figure 6: EO dimensions ROE
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
31/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 30
3.3.EO ROSThe following graph shows the correlation between the entrepreneurial orientation of a firm
and its Return on Sales (ROS).
Figure 7: EO Index ROS
Number of observations: 49DF (degrees of freedom): 2Residual DF: 47SSE (sum squared error): 0.0006697MSE (mean squared error): < 0.0001
R-Squared: 0.104203Standard error: 0.0037747p (significance): 0.0236827
Individual trend lines:Pane(r,c) p Equation
(1,1) 0.0236827 EO INDEX = 0.00331811*ROS + 0.0145408
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
32/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 31
Figure 8: EO dimensions ROS
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
33/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 32
4.Discussion4.1.Results
In this chapter I will discuss the results displayed in the previous chapter and answer the
research question.
Regarding the relationship between the level of entrepreneurial orientation (EO Index) and
the Return on Investment (ROI), my research found a positive correlation between the two (EO
INDEX = 0.00608314*ROI+0.0140291). This correlation has displayed an R-Squared equal to
0.0557311 and a (significance) of 0.102462. A positive correlation can also be found when
correlating the EO index and both the Return on Equity (ROE) and the Return on Sales (ROS). In
particular, the following equation describes the relationship between the Return on Equity and the
EO Index: EO INDEX = 0.00179466*ROE+0.0146985. In this second case, an R-Squared of
0.0551137 with a of 0.10444 were found. Finally, EO INDEX = 0.00331811*ROS+0.0145408 is
the equation that describes the correlation between the level of entrepreneurial orientation of a firm
and its Return on Sales. This relationship has shown an R-Squared of 0.104203 and a
(significance) of 0.0236827.
It is now important to understand how the findings of this study can be evaluated based on
past research. Although the literature available on the relationship between entrepreneurial
orientation and performance has been growing recently (Knight, 1997; Lyon, Lumpkin, & Dess
2000), to my knowledge a study that was conducted using the same method that I implemented in
this research project has not yet been published. Indeed, most researchers have used surveys to
directly question the top management of the firms on their level of EO (Covin & Slevin, 1989).
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
34/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 33
Therefore, this study cannot be easily compared with previous ones because of the different
methods used.
However, we can discuss previous findings on the general relationship between EO and
performance. For instance, a recent study analyzed 14,259 firms and found the correlation between
EO and performance to be .242 (Rauch, Wiklund, Lumpkin, & Frese, 2009). The authors of the
study considered this finding to indicate a moderately large correlation.
My research found lowers levels of correlation, compared to those described above. Indeed,
the values for the correlation were in the 0.002-0.006 range, while R ranged between 0.055-0.100.
Having mentioned the differences in the methodology of research, we can affirm that according to
the research I conducted a moderate positive relationship exists between the level of entrepreneurial
orientation and the performance of a firm.
In addition to the general EO Index, I also verified the type and intensity of the correlation
between performance and each one of the five dimensions with which I measured the level of EO
(autonomy, competitive aggressiveness, innovativeness, proactiveness, and risk taking.). However,
in this case, a positive correlation was not always found.
In particular, a negative correlation was found when analyzing the relationship between the
level of autonomy and the ROI and ROS. The information in my possession does not allow me to
determine the reasons for the negative relationship and future research should be conducted to
understand this result. Indeed, existing research only proves the existing positive correlation
between performance and the following EO dimensions: innovativeness, risk taking, and
proactiveness (Rauch, Wiklund, Lumpkin, & Frese, 2009).
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
35/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 34
Figure 9: Autonomy - ROI
Furthermore, it is important to acknowledge that the fact that different measures of
entrepreneurial orientation display a different degree of correlation cannot lead us to the conclusion
that some of these dimensions are more correlated than others to performance. Indeed, statistically
these differences appear to be rather small and insignificant (Rauch, Wiklund, Lumpkin, & Frese,
2009).
The study I conducted was based on a set of Italian public companies. However, research
shows that the level of entrepreneurial orientation or some of its specific dimensions may change in
intensity across different countries (Knight, 1997). Also, factors such as the type of industry and the
size of the business are likely to affect the results. Moreover, research shows that companies that
have an experimental approach to corporate entrepreneurship are more likely to achieve less
meaningful results, while firms that fully embrace the principles of corporate entrepreneurship tend
to see financial and non-financial improvements inside the organization (Morris, Kuratko, & Covin,
2010, p. 323).
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
36/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 35
4.2.ConclusionThe purpose of this research is to determine whether incentivizing an entrepreneurial
behavior inside established organizations can help achieve better financial results.
In particular, the research question I wanted to answer was the following:
What is the relationship between the entrepreneurial orientation and the
performance of a firm?
After gathering the financial information on performance for the year 2010 of a set of 49
Italian companies in the Consumers Good sector and analyzing their MD&As through the use of the
content analysis, I concluded that a moderate positive relationship exists between the level of
entrepreneurial orientation and the performance of a firm. Although the method used in this
research project differs from previous studies, as I explained earlier, this finding is still coherent
with the existing literature.
Therefore, we can conclude that companies can benefit in terms of performance if they
embrace the principles of corporate entrepreneurship, and in particular if they adopt an
entrepreneurial orientation inside their established organization. Organizations can enhance
entrepreneurial behavior by focusing on the development of the following five dimensions:
autonomy, competitive aggressiveness, innovativeness, proactiveness, and risk taking.
4.3.Further ResearchFurther research should be conducted to determine if the findings of this research are
supported across different industries and different countries. Furthermore, the method described
earlier can be improved and other statistical tools can be used to reduce the uncertainty and improve
the quality of results from the content analysis. For instance, the use of control variables such as
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
37/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 36
age, size and industry should improve the quality of the results. Also, the correlation analyses
conducted on the measures of performance and the dimensions of EO could be improved in further
research by determining other useful statistical information, such as the significance of the data for
each one of the correlations addressed.
Regarding the type of data used in this research, several decisions have been made. For
instance, this research project gathered data from the annual reports of 2010. Although this is a
valid solution that allows us to answer the research question, alternative methods could be
considered for further research. Data from multiple years could be gathered and the number of
companies included in the set could be expanded. Also, similar future studies should focus on
different sectors to determine whether or not they affect the results.
Finally, I would like to suggest a new method that could be used in future research to
determine the degree of EO of an organization. As I mentioned earlier, most of the existing research
in this field has been based on the use of surveys to assess the level of entrepreneurial orientation.
These surveys were sent to the top management of the firms, which was then supposed to evaluate
its own behavior and sometimes its own performance as well. However, the use of surveys is
always subject to a certain degree of error due to the fact that the data collected are self-reported
and therefore they are subject to bias. Indeed, social desirability and memory decay are two
examples of factors that influence the results of studies that use surveys (Rauch, Wiklund,
Lumpkin, & Frese, 2009).
Therefore, what I am proposing is a slightly different method that I believe could be able to
increase the accuracy of the measurements of EO. According to this method of research, to
determine the EO of a company, two different types of surveys should be designed and sent to each
companys management. The first one should be used by the management to assess their own level
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
38/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 37
of EO, while in the second one they would be asked to name one or more competitors and assess
their level of EO. This method would allow the researchers to have both an internal and external
perspective of a company, and in my opinion the reliability of the data collected should increase.
However, only the implementation of this method in future research can either confirm or reject my
hypothesis.
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
39/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 38
Bibliography
Barr, P. S., Stimpert, J. L., & Huff, A. S. (1992). Cognitive change, strategic action, and
organizational. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 15-36.
Brown, T., Davidsson, P., & Wiklund, J. (2001). An operationalization of Stevensons
conceptualization of entrepreneurship as opportunity-based firm behavior. Strategic
Management Journal, 22, 953968.
Carley, K. M. (1997). Extracting team mental models through textual analysis. Journal of
Organizational Behavior, 18, 533-558.
Cortesi, A., Furlan, S., & Tettamanzi, P. (2008). Contabilit e bilancio. Rilevazioni, valutazioni,
analisi. Milano: IPSOA.
Covin, J. G., & Miles, M. P. (1999). Corporate entrepreneurship and the pursuit of competitive
advantage.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23, 4764.
Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior.
Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16, 7-25.
Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign
environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 75-87.
Covin, J. G., Ireland, R. D., & Kuratko, D. F. (2003). Exploring and exploitation functions of
corporate venturing.Academy of Management, Annual Meeting. Seattle, WA.
DAveni, R. A., & MacMillan, I. C. (1990). Crisis and the content of managerial communications:
A study of the focus of attention of top managers in surviving and failing firms.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 634-657.
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
40/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 39
Dess, G., Lumpkin, G. T., & Eisner, A. (2010). Strategic management: Text and cases (5 ed.). New
York City: McGraw Hill.
Farson, R., & Keyes, R. (2002). The Failure-Tolerant Leader. Harvard Business Review, 80(8), 64-
71.
Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board. (1999, April). Management's discussion and
analysis. Retrieved August 17, 2011, from FASAB.org:
http://www.fasab.gov/pdffiles/15_md&a.pdf
Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1996). Strategic leadership: Top executives and their effects on
organizations. New York: West.
Guth, W., & Ginsberg, A. (1990). Guest editors introduction: Corporate entrepreneurship. Strategic
Management Journal, 11, 297-308.
Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., Camp, S. M., & Sexton, D. (2001). Guest editors introduction to the
special issue of strategic entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation.
Strategic Management Journal, 22, 479-491.
Howe, S. (2010, April 6). Corporate America, find your hidden entrepreneurs. Retrieved June 9,
2011, from Bloomberg Businessweek:
http://www.businessweek.com/managing/content/apr2010/ca2010046_348670.htm
Kaya, H., & Aca, V. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and performance of Turikish
manufacturing FDI firms: An empirical study.Iktisat Isletme ve Finans, 24(275), 115-133.
Knight, G. A. (1997). Cross-cultural reliability and validity of a scale to measure firm
entrepreneurial orientation.Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 213-225.
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
41/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 40
Kuratko, D. F., Ireland, R. D., & Hornsby, J. S. (2004). Corporate entrepreneurship behavior among
managers: A review of theory, research, and practice. Advances in Entrepreneurship; Firm
Emergence and Growth, 7, 7-45.
Lengnick-Hall, C. A. (1992). Innovation and competitive advantage: What we know and what we
need to learn.Journal of Management , 18(2), 399-429.
Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and
linking it to performance.Academy of Management Review, 21, 135-172.
Lyon, D. W., Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2000). Enhancing entrepreneurial orientation
research: Operationalizing and measuring a key strategic decision making process. Journal
of Management, 26, 1055-1085.
MacMillan, I. C., & Day, D. L. (1987). Corporate ventures into industrial markets: Dynamics of
aggressive entry.Journal of Business Venturing, 2, 29-39.
Morris, M. H., Kuratko, D. F., & Covin, J. G. (2010). Corporate Entrepreneurship & Innovation
(III ed.). Mason, OH, USA: South-Western, Cengage Learning.
Ramachandran, K., Devarajan, T. P., & Ray, S. (2006). Corporate entrepreneurship: How? Vikalpa,
31(1), 85-97.
Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G. T., & Frese, M. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and
business performance: An assessment of past research and suggestions for the future.
Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 761-787.
Roberts, N. (1984). Transforming leadership: Sources, process, and consequences. Presented at
Academy of Management conference, Boston.
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
42/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 41
Russell, R. D. (1999). Developing a process model of intrapreneurial systems: A cognitive mapping
approach.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(1), 65-84.
Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo biasis in decision making. Journal of Risk and
Uncertainty, 1, 7-59.
Sathe, V. (1988). From surface to deep entrepreneurship. Human Resource Management, 27(4),
389-411.
Sciascia, S., & De Vita, R. (2004). The development of entrepreneurial research. Liuc Papers n.
146, Serie economica aziendale. .
Short, J. C., & Palmer, T. B. (2003). Organizational performance referents: An empirical
examination of their content and influences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision
Processes, 90, 209-224.
Short, J. C., Payne, G. T., Brigham, K. H., Lumpkin, G. T., & Broberg, J. C. (2009). Family firms
and entrepreneurial orientation in publicly traded firms : A comparative analysis of the S&P
500. Family Business Reivew, 22(1), 9-24.
Smart, D. T., & Conant, J. S. (1994). Entrepreneurial orientation, distinctive marketing,
competencies and organizational performance. Journal of Applied Business Research, 10,
28-28.
Stevenson, H. H., & Jarillo, J. C. (1990). Aparadigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial
management. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 1727.
Stevenson, H. H., Roberts, M. J., & Grousbeck, H. (1999). New Business Ventures and the
Entrepreneur. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
8/4/2019 Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance - Giorgio Tomassetti
43/43
ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE 42
Tushman, M. L., Newman, W. H., & Romanelli, E. (1986). Convergence and upheaval: Managing
the unsteady pace of organizational evolution. California Management Review, 29, 2944.
Venkatraman, N. (1989). Strategic orientation of business enterprises: The construct,
dimensionality, and measurement.Management Science, 35, 942-962.
Von Hippel, E. (1977). Successful and failing internal corporate ventures: An empirical analysis.
Industrial Marketing Management, 6, 163174.
Wall, M. (2011, August 17). Failure is key to innovation, Facebook CIO says. Retrieved August
2011, 19, from Business News Daily: http://www.businessnewsdaily.com/failure-drives-
innovation-1674/
Weber, R. P. (1990).Basic content analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Zahra, S. A. (1996). Governance, ownership and corporate entrepreneurship among the Fortune
500: The moderating impact of industry technological opportunities. Academy of
Management Journal, 39, 17131735.
Zahra, S. A., & Covin, J. G. (1995). Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship
Performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(1),
43-58.