8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
1/117
Universit della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano
Faculty of Economics
The Decision Making Process
Behind the Choice of
Emirates Stadium
Masters dissertation
Authors: Gianluca Allevi
Andrea DellOlio
Supervisor: Prof. Balazs Kovacs
Second Reader: Prof. Nikolaus Beck
Academic Year: 2013/2014
Submission Date: 12thof June 2014
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
2/117
"
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
3/117
#
Victory through harmony
(Arsenal F.C. Motto)
Our aim is to be a leading European club
and once we get into the new stadium,
we will be in that position.
It is very income-generous to us.
(Keith Edelman Finanaging Director Arsenal F.C from 2000 to 2008)
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
4/117
$
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
5/117
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
6/117
&
3.2 NEW HIGHBURY STADIUM: COST, EVALUATION OF REVENUES,
PROBABILITIESANDFUTUREESTIMATIONS 94
3.3 DECISIONTREES 98
3.3.1 First Scenario: Standard Decision Tree 98
3.3.2 Second Scenario: Refocus Of The Strategy To The Top 101
3.3.3 Third Scenario: Clubs Financial Troubles 103
CONCLUSIONS 105
REFERENCES 107
APPENDICES 110
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
7/117
'
FIGURES, TABLES AND GRAPHS
FIGURES
Figure 1Porters Value Chain Analysis 34
Figure 2:Arsenals BCG Matrix 36
Figure 3: Revenue distribution by country (2009/10 season) 50
Figure 4: Key Stadium data of the top European Clubs ranked by stadium capacity
(season 2010/11) 51
Figure 5: Ownership map of stadiums in Europe in 2010 52
Figure 6:Revenue generation in the top European clubs stadium (2009/2010) 53
Figure 7:Development costs in recently built stadium 55
Figure 8: Highbury and Emirates Map 58
Figure 9: Emirates Mendelows power/interest matrix 69
Figure 10: First Scenario: Standard Decision Tree 100
Figure 11: Second Scenario: Refocus of Strategy to the Top 102
Figure 12: Third Scenario: Arsenals Financial Troubles 104
TABLES
Table 1: Revenues and Wages of Five Major Leagues 18
Table 2: Property segment from 2002/2003 to 2009/2010 64
Table 3:Revenues from Match-day Tickets 74
Table 4: Revenues from Match-day Tickets 83
Table 5:Ratio between Differential Revenues and Constructions Investment 84
Table 6:Emirates Season Attendances, 2006-2013 89
Table 7: Emirates Season Attendances and Main Drivers, 2006-2013 90
Table 8: Emirates Capacity, Annual Increase in Price, and Champions League
Qualifications Probability 91
Table 9: Estimation of High and Low Attendances Probabilities with or without
Champions League 92
Table 10:Emirates Forecasted Revenues until 2031 93
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
8/117
(
Table 11:New Highbury Estimation of Season Attendances and Main Drivers, 2006-
2013 95
Table 12:New Highburys Forecasted Revenues until 2031 96
Table 13: Juventus Stadium Data, Ratios, and Probabilities. 97
Table 14:Arsenal F.C. Income Statement 110
Table 15:Arsenal F.C.Balance Sheet 111
Table 16:Arsenal F.C. Cash Flow 112
Table 17:Estimated Revenues per Match 113
Table 18:Emirates Forecasted Revenues until 2031 (Second Scenario) 114
Table 19:New Highburys Forecasted Revenues until 2031 (Second Scenario) 115
Table 20:Emirates Forecasted Revenues until 2031 (Third Scenario) 116
Table 21:New Highburys Forecasted Revenues until 2031 (Third Scenario) 117
GRAPHS
Graph 1. Revenues trend 2011-2013 39
Graph 2: Profits trend 2011-2013 41
Graph 3: EBIT trend 2011-2013 42
Graph 4: Current and Quick Ratio 43
Graph 5:Debtor Collection Period; Stock Holding Period, Creditor Collection
Period, and Working Capital Cycle. 44
Graph 6: Operating Cash Flow 46
Graph 7: Free Cash Flow 47
Graph 8: Financing Cash Flow 47
Graph 9: Property segment from 2002/2003 to 2009/2010 64Graph 10: Revenues from Match-day Tickets 75
Graph 11: Revenues from Match-day Tickets 83
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
9/117
)
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
10/117
*+
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
For us, this thesis is not a conclusion, but a starting point. The road to the
achievement of this goal has been hard and, often, uphill. We have been through
many difficult moments. For this reason, we would like to thank the people who have
always believed in us and accompanied us through this arduous, but wonderful
experience.
First of all, I would like to thank my travel mate, Dello, with whom I had an
amazing time, full of both fun and work. A classmate who became a brother.
Then, I would like to thank our relator, Professor Balazs Kovacs, who has been
always willing and ready to help us when we needed, both during the assembling of
this thesis and during his academic courses. A special thank also to Professor, and
Director of the Master of Management, Nikolaus Beck, who has kindly agreed to act
as second reader for our thesis.
A great thank to my parents, Daniele and Arianna; my sisters, Giada and Chiara; my
eight nephews, Rebecca, Blu, Anthea, Mos, Penelope, Ludovica, Agnese and
Virginia; my brothers in law, Andrea e Simone and my grandmothers, Nonna Marisa
and Nonna Chicca. They have always been able to give me comfort during those
times of troubles, by supporting me and helping me to never give up.
I would like to thank also Bordi, Nespo, Cielo, Michi and Jack, who are not just
classmates for me, but real friends, who have always been able to give me moments
of joy and happiness. Thank also to our University Fooball Team, Hajduk
Bancariellese.
Finally, but not least, I would like to thank the friends of a lifetime, those with whom
I share passions and fun, those that will not leave me ever. Thanks to Giulia, Gila,
Teino, Neno, Beppe, Teo, Mile, Cappa, Satu, Falco and Pech.
Gianluca
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
11/117
**
First of all I would like to thank the person who shared this journey with me and
with whom I am proud to end my academic path, Gianluca. I will never forget all
these days spent together at work, which contributed to the development of our great
friendship that will bind us forever.
I would like to express my special appreciation and thanks to my relator, Professor
Kovacs. Without his guidance and consistent support this thesis would not have been
possible. I am most grateful to Professor Beck, for his extreme kindness and
willingness to act as a second reader and for his teachings, which have been very
useful in the drafting of this paper.
I am deeply grateful to my parents, Enzo and Rosanna, for their endless love,
support and encouragement throughout my life. Thank you for giving me the strength
to reach for the stars and chase my dreams.
I would like to express my gratitude to my Grandfather Riccardo. Even if you are no
longer with me, thank you, because in your own way you taught me many things.
Words cannot express how grateful I am to my girlfriend Giulia. Thanks for being
always next to me. Your support and contribution have been crucial. You are my
tornado, but also my shore.
To my classmates, Miky, Bordi, Cielo, Nespo, Jack, Liuk and all the guys of the
Hajduk Bancariellese, thanks for the fun and support. This two amazing years and
the victory of two tournaments are memories that I will carry with me forever.
Finally but not least, I am most grateful to the friends with whom I travelled through
life: Treka, Liuk, Passa, Dani, Silvi, Ele, Gian, Dea, Diego, Pitt, Franci and Fuga.
They have always supported me and helped me to strive towards my goal.
Andrea
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
12/117
*"
ABSTRACT
This research deals with the choice, made by Arsenal F.C., of building a new stadium
in a different area from where its home ground was. Our aim is to understand if, from
a financial perspective, this was the best decision that the Club could take or if the
reconstruction of a new structure on the same foundations of the old Highbury
Stadium would have been a better alternative. To make the analysis easier, we are
going to pretend that a new stadium has been built in the same place of the old one,
with the name of New Highbury. Concerning this scenario, we are going to make a
useful comparison with the new Juventus Stadium, which was built in the same
area of the old Delle Alpi. The research question we aim to answer is the
following:
Is the choice of building the new stadium in a new area, transforming the old one in
apartments, the best solution? Or the best decision would be the reconstruction of
the new stadium on the same foundations of the old Highbury?
In order to understand the underlying strategy of Arsenal as a whole, we start with a
Managerial and Financial Analysis. As a matter of fact, our aim is to identify which
choice would be better, with respect to the research question, according to the
strategy used. Thanks to these analyses, we can say that Arsenals strategy is long-
term oriented and it is a solid and healthy club.
The core of the thesis is represented by the data analysis and the forecasts of the
Emirates Stadium, which has a capacity of 60.335 seats, and the potential New
Highbury Stadium, with a maximum capacity of 48.000 seats. Through the use of
TreePlan Excel Tool, we developed three different scenarios in order to answer to
our initial purpose. The first scenario is the Standard one, in which we took into
consideration the actual strategy utilized by Arsenal. The results of this scenario
seem to indicate that the choice of building the new stadium in a different area was
the right one. The second situation that we simulated is about a possible refocusing
towards the top in strategy, by following the Manchester Uniteds model, and the
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
13/117
*#
result is the same as the previous one. Thus, building the Emirates has proven to be
the best solution. The last scenario concerns a possible financial crisis of the Club,
which would force Arsenal to downsize its goals. In this case the outcome would be
the opposite and the New Highbury Stadium would have been the better alternative.
Nevertheless, as long as the important financial virtues of the Club are concerned,
the latter option seems unlikely to happen. Thus it could be concluded that the
Emirates choice was the right one.
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
14/117
*$
PREFACE
We have always been fascinated by football and this great passion moved us to be
involved not only on the field, but also concerning the managerial, economics and
financial issues connected to it. As we both feel the strong desire and dream to work
in this world, we therefore decided to attend a course of Sport Management, some
months ago, during which the idea of writing this Master Thesis born. We hope that
this could be the starting point for our future career development.
Nowadays in this business, one of the biggest challenges that each club can face is
the Financial Fair Play. A way to overturn this situation could be to build an owned
stadium.
The reason why we chose Arsenal F.C. derives from the fact that the new Emirates
Stadium was one of the first stadiums thought not only as the place to play, but also
as a commercial hub, where supporters are provided with a range of additional
facilities, such as restaurants, coffees, an official store, a commercial center and a
team museum. It is our view that all these amenities are used as a way to involve not
only football fans, but also families and women. This is the only means to make a
stadium a profitable investment.
Arsenal F.C. is proactive in this situation; in fact the last economic performances
show how the revenues are enhanced from an innovative management of the assets
of the Club, like a stadium seen as a resource.
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
15/117
*%
INTRODUCTION
Arsenal Football Club is one of the strongest teams in the English Premier League
and it is also recognized as one of the most important clubs all over the world. It was
founded in 1886 by some workers of the Royal Arsenal in Woolwich, a district in
southeast London, with the name of Dial Square, but during the years the name was
changed in Woolwich Arsenal. After the bankruptcy in 1913 Henry Norris bought
the Club and he decided to rename it Arsenal F.C.1.
Arsenal F.C is one of the oldest football teams in the world. As a consequence, its
trophy cabinet increased over the time up to win a great number of honours. Arsenal
Holdings plc is the company, which controls Arsenal F.C. Arsenal Holdings plc has
a total of 62.219 shares in issues that are owned by KSE UK Inc. (wholly owned by
Stan Kroenke) for 66,85% and by RED and WHITE SECURITIES LTD for
30.02%2.
We chose to analyze the Arsenals situation because it was one of the first clubs to
build a modern stadium, which is thought to produce income, and thus, it is
revenues-oriented. The pathway, used to meet the research questionand mentioned
in the Preface, begins with the managerial and financial overviews of Arsenal F.C.,
in order to better understand the overall situation of the Club. The subsequent stage
consists in an outline of the European stadiums context, to introduce the core of the
thesis, which is the Emirates Stadium and the decision making process.
In the first chapter we examine Arsenal from the managerial and financial point of
view. The framework of this part involves the English Football Industry Porters
Five Forces Analysis, the Arsenals strategy in comparison with its main domestic
competitors, the Arsenals SWOT Analysis compared with the one of Manchester
United, the Arsenals Value Chain Analysis and BCG Matrix. The second section
1Arsenal Website, www.arsenal.com/history/laying-the-foundations/laying-the-foundations-overview. Accessed, 27 February 2014
2Arsenal, Website, www.arsenal.com/the-club/corporate-info/the-arsenal-board. Accessed 27 February 2014
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
16/117
*&
deals with the financial analysis of the Club with Manchester United taken as a
benchmark.
The second chapter regards the description of the situation of the European stadiums,
useful to survey the main drivers of introits deriving from match-day. Subsequently,
we deepen the Arsenals context, firstly focusing on the move from the old Highbury
to the new Emirates Stadium and then describing carefully every Emirates feature,
such as its construction and its opening, its design, the transport, the benefits, the
stakeholders and the financing. We also include a Financial Evaluation, considering
both the direct and the indirect impact. Finally, we briefly analyze the Juventus
Stadium case in order to have a benchmark for the potential New Highbury Stadium,
which could have had similar characteristics.
The third chapter represents the essence of the issue and refers to the decision
making process, the data collection, the analysis and estimations (revenues, costs,
probabilities and projections) of the Emirates and the New Highbury. These data are
critical to build our decision tree by using the TreePlan Excel Tool. We develop
three scenarios that help us to find some potential answers to the research question,
trying to determine whether the Arsenals choice of building the Emirates has been
the right one.
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
17/117
*'
1 ARSENALS OVERVIEW
1.1ARSENAL F.C. MANAGERIAL ANALYSIS
We chose to start our managerial analysis from the study of the English Football
Industry. As mentioned by a Deloittes analysis, the Premier League Clubs revenue
are increasing up to 25% for the season 2013-2014, after a record of 2,5 billion in
2012-2013 (Deloitte, 2013: 7). As Dane Jones, a partner in the Sports Business
Group at Deloitte, observed:
Despite operating in a challenging economic environment, English club football's profile,
exposure and increasingly global interest have continued to drive revenue growth for the top
clubs" (Deloitte, 2013).
Premier Leagues revenues come from different kind of sources that are:
Match day, which accounts for 23%;
Broadcast, which accounts for 50%;
Commercial, which accounts for 27%.
An additional number of Financial Fair Play rules have also been inserted into the
Premier League, independently from those created by UEFA. These rules have been
developed with the purpose to focus on the respect of the costs to avoid an excessive
debt3. Table 1 shows the revenues and the wages, in euros, for the top 5 European
Leagues in the season 2011-2012:
#BBC Website, http://www.bbc.com/news/business-22766638. Accessed 1 March 2014
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
18/117
*(
Premier League, England 2,9 bln 2 bln (70% of revenues)
Bundesliga, Germany 1,9 bln 1 bln(51% of revenues)
La Liga, Spain 1,8 bln 1,1 bln (60% of revenues)
Serie A, Italy 1,6 bln 1,2 bln (75% of revenues)Ligue 1, France 1,1 bln 0,8 bln (74% of revenues)
Table 1: Revenues and Wages of the Five Major Leagues
Source: Deloitte Analysis, 2013
The most important requirement for the Financial Fair Play Regulation is the
UEFAs own break-even requirement, that will be applied for the first time to the
financial results of 2013-2014. In 2011-2012 the German Bundesliga and the Premier
League, has been the only two European Leagues to produce a positive operating
profit. The total operating profit of Premier League is 98 million, while the one of
the German Bundesliga 154 million. There are only 8 clubs in Premier League able
to generate a net profit4.
1.1.1 English Football Industry Porters Five Forces Analysis
An effective tool that can be used to make a more specific analysis of the industry is
the Porters Five Forces Analysis. We chose this framework in order to better
understand the competitive intensity and attractiveness of the English Football
Industry. In this way, we could find some possible strategies, which can make the
business more profitable.
Bargaining Power of Suppliers
The players themselves are the most important part of a football club. A football club
should be able to develop a team composed by a well-balanced roster of goalkeepers,
defenders, midfielders and forwards. Basically, a football team has several ways of
choosing its players. One of these possibilities is to purchase a player with the
$BBC Website, http://www.bbc.com/news/business-22766638. Accessed 1 March 2014
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
19/117
*)
desired features from another club (in the UK or worldwide). This option is very
expensive, due to the fact that with the contract in force the club should pay an
unreasonable fee to convince the other club to sell the player. The second and more
profitable way consists into creating a youth sector with a huge investment in young
talent and scouting. Therefore, the club acquires young football players for lower
costs and has the chance to train them to become possible future champions. Arsenal
F.C. is at the forefront in this policy.
To conclude, the Bargaining Power of Suppliers could be both high and low,
depending on the strategy chosen by the football club that looks for human capital.
Bargaining Power of Buyers
Concerning the customers, we can divide them into different categories. As far as
profits are concerned, sponsors and Television Companies are the most important, as
they provide a high stream of revenues that allow the clubs to buy top players. In
return, football teams have to guarantee to the sponsoring brand a great visibility, for
example by wearing its logo on the football jerseys or giving its name at a stadium.
As we see it, clubs should try to tie the sponsor to them with long-term contracts in
order to gain more money. With regard to the Television Companies, teams have to
ensure them the TV rights so that they broadcast day matches.
Considering the revenues, also the supporters should be considered as potential
purchasers, as they could buy tickets for the games or for stadium and museum tours,
football jerseys and additional facilities that can be found across the stadium or in the
eventual official stores. Each club should be able to create a loyal bond with the fans,
making them changing from being only occasional supporters to season ticket
holders.
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
20/117
"+
Given this evidence, it can be seen that the Bargaining Power of Buyers depends on
the brand of the club. The stronger the brand is, the lower is the bargaining power of
the buyers.
Threat Of New Entrants
Nowadays, entering in this industry could be extremely hard. This is mainly due to
high initial capital requirements, some government policies (such as taxation) and the
economies of scales (in terms of catchment area).
Regarding the initial capital requirements, we have to consider that major clubs need
large stadiums and new top players. Considering this, setting up a football club out of
nothing that is able to be competitive from the start seems to be impossible and this
is the reason why we have not taken into consideration this choice. As a matter of
fact, the richest tycoons are more inclined to buy teams that are not yet renowned,
but are established since a lot of time and have high potentialities of growing. In
order to reduce the stadiums costs, the new owner could build the new house in a
region far away from the city, in a non-metropolitan area. The main trouble stands in
the fact that supporters are not likely to accept this situation and, thus, the choice of
the location becomes very critical.
Also the government policies could affect the profitability of an investment in a
football team. This is principally due to the difference in taxation between different
countries. For example, Spanish clubs take advantage from the fiscal law that allows
them to pay high wages without weighing it down with a high taxation.
Concerning the economies of scales, they refer to the catchment area that means the
number of potential supporters who can follow the club, granting additional profits to
the team. In order to explain this issue in a better way, we decided to focus the
attention on the French case. Recently, two tycoons acquired PSG and Monaco. As
we all know, Paris is the biggest city in France and thus has a greater number of
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
21/117
"*
potential supporters in comparison to Monaco. For this reason, in terms of
merchandising and revenues from tickets, PSG is without any doubts more
profitable.
In conclusion, we could assume that the Entry Barriers are very high and this implies
that only few rich people can enter and be part of this world, thus the Threat of New
Entrants is very low.
Threat Of Substitute Products
First of all, we need to clarify that we are going to consider the match-day as the
main product that clubs can offer. Indeed, the only way to gain direct revenues for a
football club is selling the tickets to watch a match live. However, not all the
supporters are willing to pay the tickets fees, since they may not afford it or they
live too far away from the stadiums. If these fans do not want to lose the match, they
can watch it on the TV or on their mobile phones, tablets and PCs. This could be
considered as an advantage for the clubs, as broadcasters pay them the TV rights,
which grant additional revenues. Nonetheless, the problem for the teams is that in
this way a substitute product comes into the market, taking away a certain part of
direct revenues deriving from tickets.
The evidence seems to indicate that the Threat of Substitute Products is medium,
because on one hand TVs guarantee a high quality service by offering an excellent
view of the match, with also connections on the field edge and on the locker rooms.
However, on the other hand, the stadium gives to the supporter a particular feeling
that is definitely that cannot be experienced from the sofa.
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
22/117
""
Rivalry Among Existing Firms
As we are analyzing the situation from the economic perspective, our study will
focus on the revenues produced by the loyalty of supporters that results into the
selling of tickets and merchandising. Rivals are the clubs that compete in the Premier
League and in the European Cups.
Supporters loyalty usually is very strong. Indeed, we suppose that if a person is fan
of certain team, he would not change it with another and, thus, rarely he would go to
watch another team playing. However, there are some exceptional reasons why
people may change their cheering, such as their moving to another area of the
country, excessive tickets prices and a low performance of the beloved team.
As a result, the Rivalry among Existing Firms could be enhanced, for the reasons we
mentioned above, it should be considered relatively low.
To summarize our Porters Five Forces Analysis on the English Football Industry,
we demonstrated that the Barriers to Entry are very high and, consequently, it is not
easy for new firms to penetrate the market. Nonetheless, with the right investments
and approaches, this industry could be very attractive. The best strategies that a firm
can pursue, in order to gain many profits and be competitive, are: focusing on young
talents and selling them when they reach the top; increasing match-day revenues and
signing the best sponsorship deals.
1.1.2 Arsenal F.C. and Main Domestic Competitors Strategy
In this section our aim is to describe the most important strategies of Arsenal and its
main domestic Competitors, which are Manchester United F.C., Manchester City
F.C., Chelsea F.C.. We are going to show them with respect to five different drivers:
Manager, Academy, Acquisition, Investment Strategy, and Stadium. The analysis
will focus on a comparison between Arsenals strategy and its Competitors in
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
23/117
"#
relation to each single driver. We will consider only Competitors with a crucial
feature concerning the driver analyzed.
Manager
Arsne Wenger is a French football manager, in charge at Arsenal F.C. since 1996.
The policy of Arsenal F.C. was trying to entrust the team to the right manager for a
long period of time, in order to provide continuity by focusing on the long-term.
Through to this decision, the Club put an exceptional authority in the hand of this
person, supporting him completely and fully. The reason that stands behind this
choice is due to the fact that Arsne uses an intellectual approach combined with
statistical tools in order to develop a sparkling game that has always been
appreciated by supporters. He is very skilled to develop abilities of youth players5.
Manchester United has always had the same philosophy of Arsenal. In fact, its
legendary former manager Sir Alex Ferguson has been in charge for 26 years until
season 2012/2013. His incredible self-confidence and resolution led the United to
win 28 trophies. He was also very careful to the academy and he had great
motivational and tactical skills. In particular, he was very good at managing players
expectations, lifting them up6.
Chelsea F.C., in contrast, has never had this mindset, but it has always depended on
the whims of its owner, Roman Abramovich, who was obsessed with the dream of
winning the UEFA Champions League. His short-term orientation brought him to
choose Jos Mourinho as Chelseas manager. Mourinho, differently from Wenger
and Ferguson, is very eccentric and squeezes the most out of his players. Moreover,
he is not very focused on discovering and training new young talents.
5Bleacher Report Website,www.bleacherreport.com/articles/368521-the-arsenal-football-club-conundrum. Accessed 4 March
2014
6Goal Website, www.goal.com/en/news/9/england/2013/09/11/4254424/sir-alex-ferguson-details-the-strategy-behind-26-years-
of. Accessed 4 March 2014
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
24/117
"$
The strategy of Arsenal is very similar to the one of Manchester United, but there are
some differences in the overall Clubs policies, which make the sports performance
of MU better. Nevertheless, Wengers approach has always perfectly reflected the
Arsenal Clubs philosophy, as he develops young talents and sells them at very high
prices when they reach the top.
Academy
Arsenal F.C. has always invested many resources in order to establish an excellent
youth players academy. First of all, the Club built advanced sport facilities, which
enables the youth players to train in the best conditions. Besides, the Team hired a
large networks of scouts with the intent of finding the most talented players all
around the world. Arsne Wenger continuously monitors the youth academy and
personally selects those who are ready for the first team7.
Manchester United uses the same strategy. As a matter of fact, it is the English club
that produces the highest number of players within the Europes top five leagues.
Thus, the focus on the youth academy of the MU is very significant, with 24 of its
academy athletes currently playing in the major European leagues. This is the great
result of the work made by both the Manager and the Club during the years. We can
compare this achievement with the Arsenals one, which, with 20 players, is the
second Club in England, with respect to this specific ranking8.
Analyzing Manchester City and Chelseas situation, it appears evident that they are
placed far behind Arsenal and United, as their policies do not really involve the
develop of young players. This context is very likely to produce a critical
competitive disadvantage, in the long-term.
'Arsenal Website, www.arsenal.com/academy. Accessed 4 March 2014
(Give Me Sport Website, www.givemesport.com/259483-manchester-united-best-youth-academy-in-england. Accessed 4
March 2014
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
25/117
"%
Acquisition
Concerning the acquisition process, Arsenal F.C. established its first team by
purchasing young professional players, but not yet famous, in order to make them
future champions, and, as we explained above, selecting the best talented players
from the youth academy.
Uniteds strategy is slightly different. It has certainly a great focus on the most
talented young athletes, but at the same time it mixed them with expensive purchases
of important and experienced players. This approach makes the good but unripe
players able to grow alongside of great champions and then replace them, without
being sold to other teams.
The policies of City and Chelsea, also in this case, are very different from the ones
implemented by Arsenal and United, as they are characterized by reckless
investments on already established players and without a well-defined technical
project. This attitude is proved by the huge amount of money expended in the
transfer campaign, which cost respectively !115 million for City and !78 million for
Chelsea9.
Investment Strategy
As mentioned before, according to Arsenal policy, the young players are sold when
they are at the highest level of their career and not when they are in decline, to earn
the maximum capital gain. Furthermore, we can say that this Club can very
effectively manage its distribution channel like its official stores, which sell the
merchandise of the team. In addition, Arsenal F.C. is also very smart in attracting the
most profitable sponsors (i.e. Fly Emirates and recently Puma)10.
)Calcio Serie A 1 Website, www.calcio-seriea1.blogspot.ch/2013/09/calciomercato-soldi-spesi-campagna-acquisti.html.
Accessed 4 March 2014
*+Arsenal Website, www.arsenal.com/the-club/sponsors-partners. Accessed 4 March 2014
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
26/117
"&
Concerning Manchester United, its main aim seems to be increasing the income and
the profits by extending the business a global level through the expansion of the
portfolio of sponsors, the intense focus on retail and merchandising and the
exploitation of the new opportunities offered on the Internet, mobiles and social
media. Another purpose is to create a complex strategy to raise its share of TV
rights11
. This strategy is more profitable than Arsenals one, even if they are similar,
because the brand equity and awareness of MU is higher.
Manchester City and Chelsea, instead, focused their investment policy on the
purchasing of players, whereas sponsorships come mainly from the sources related to
the ownerships (Roman Abramovich and Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan).
Stadium
Before 2006, Arsenal F.C.s home was the Highbury Stadium, since 1913. The
new Emirates Stadium was inaugurated just in 2006. The investment for the new
stadium cost 470 million and it was financed mainly by three kinds of sources:
The transfer of the naming rights of the stadium to the airline company
Emirates (about 150 million);
A long-term bank loan (expiration in 2031) for 260 million;
Revenues deriving from the real estate site of Highbury Square (680
apartments) for the remainder.
The building of the Emirates doubled Arsenal F.C.s revenues deriving from the
stadium for some different reasons:
Increasing of available seating, from 38.500 to 60.335, with a fill rate of
91%;
**Manchester United Website, http://ir.manutd.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=133303&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=1736054&highlight=.
Accessed 4 March 2014
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
27/117
"'
Increasing of the tickets costs, the highest between all the clubs of the
Premier League (this strategy can be pursued thanks to the extremely long
waiting list, which is about 37.000 persons every year);
The creation of 9.000 premium seats that represent 35% of stadiums
revenues themselves;
A very strong increase of the amount and quality of the services offered
within the stadium (catering, merchandising, stores and commercial center).
The Emirates is the second largest stadium in Premier League and one of the most
advanced stadiums in the world. It is provided with 450 HD LCD screens. Moreover,
in order to allow supporters to fully enjoy the wide range of services the stadiums
gates open 90 minutes before the match-day. It is also used as conference center or
for concerts. It has also been selected as the location for the Rugby World Cup in
201512.
A similar strategy about the stadium was implemented by Manchester City, through
the development of City of Manchester Stadium (named also Etihad Stadium). This
is the fifth largest stadium in Premier League, with a capacity of 47.805 seats. It is a
very modern stadium, which produces huge revenues. Besides, its development costs
were much lower than Emirates (112.000.000)13, due to its lower capacity and the
lower costs of real estate in Manchester compared to London. Manchester City and
Arsenal are the only two clubs in Premier League, which grant the naming rights of
their stadiums. Indeed, City earns an amount of 18,23 million per year through
them. However, this sponsorship generated many suspicions since it could be
conceived as a way to circumvent the Financial Fair Play, as the pockets of thesponsor firms and those of the owner of the Club are the same14.
*"Tifoso Bilanciato Website, www.tifosobilanciato.it/2012/01/29/stadi-di-calcio-lemirates-stadium-ed-il-suo-impatto-
sullarsenal-un-perfetto-case-study/. Accessed 4 March 2014
*#Wikipedia Website, www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_Manchester_Stadium. Accessed 4 March 2014
*$Calcio e Finanza Website, www.calcioefinanza.it/naming-right-suggli-stadi-della-premier-possibili-incassi-per-oltre-60-
milioni/. Accessed 4 March 2014
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
28/117
"(
Conversely Manchester United, although it owns the Old Trafford that is a very
important stadium, does not grant any naming right. The reason stands in the fact that
the historical image of this Stadium would lead to potential lower income for the
sponsorship firm15. The Old Trafford is the greater stadium of the whole Premier
League with a capacity of 75.731 seats. It was built in 1909, but several
modernizations made throughout the years converted it into a very up-to-date
stadium16.
On this basis it may be inferred that the Arsenal strategy is well-structured and
balanced, very similar to the policy of Manchester United from many perspectives.
Nonetheless, although Arsenal is more focused on long-term and financial stability,
if really wants to boost its sport performances, it should try to emulate even more the
model pursued by the United, especially retaining its best players and increasing its
brand awareness.
1.1.3 Arsenals SWOT Analysis: a Comparison with Manchester
United
In the Strategy Analysis section we determined that a possible Arsenals future
approach could be a leap in quality upward. For this reason, we developed a SWOT
analysis of Arsenal in comparison with Manchester United, since this Club may be
its touchstone if Arsenal really feels the need for reaching this goal. We chose this
kind of analysis as it allows us to examine in depth strengths, weaknesses,
opportunities and threats, and develop different smart approaches in order to gain a
competitive advantage. We are now going to analyze in detail these four elements.
*%Calcio e Finanza Website, www.calcioefinanza.it/naming-right-suggli-stadi-della-premier-possibili-incassi-per-oltre-60-
milioni/. Accessed 4 March 2014
*&Wikipedia Website, www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Trafford. Accessed 4 March 2014
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
29/117
")
Arsenals Strengths
An important strength of Arsenal is its developed brand name that is very strong in
England and all over the world thanks to the fact that the Club was able to strengthen
it through marketing and merchandising. Concerning this perspective, the
construction of the Emirates Stadium, which is one of the most advanced stadiums in
the world, was particularly critical, as it enhanced the brand equity of the Club and
strengthened its supporters loyalty, not only in England but also in the rest of the
world. Therefore, the plant contributed to attract very important sponsor firms, such
as first of all Emirates Airline, but also Huawei, Nike and Puma starting from the
next season. This aim was also achieved through the great ability of a stable and
competent management in managing sponsors, which granted also a financial
stability in the short and long-term, with almost always-positive free cash flows.
Manchester Uniteds Strengths
The greatest strength of Manchester United is its extremely high brand awareness,
together with its incredible global recognition, which attracts a wide number of
sponsoring firms. As a matter of facts, the company concluded some agreements
with Audi, Nike, AON, AIG, Sharp, Vodafone, Airtel and Turkish Airlines. This is
also due to its superb marketing strategy, its global presence and its ability to
merchandise its products. Manchester United used this strategy in order to create a
strong brand loyalty between its supporters, which is supported by the fact of being
the most successful English football club. Its wonderful history is reflected by its
fantastic stadium, which is another strength of MU.
Arsenals Weaknesses
As long as weaknesses are concerned, we want to claim that the match-day tickets
are too expensive, the most high-priced of the Premier League. According to us, this
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
30/117
#+
policy is not fair at all, since the Team did not win any trophy during the last years
and its supporters are not stimulated by the strategy implemented by Arsenal
management, which is selling champions focusing on new young players. Moreover,
in order to finance the investments in the new stadium, the Club was forced to sign
long-term contracts with sponsors, penalizing commercial revenues. In this sense,
new trends are oriented towards the searching of new private investors and it is
emphasized by the fact that English football market reached the maturity phase.
Manchester Uniteds Weaknesses
Actually, Manchester United has not many weaknesses, but some of them are
fundamental. First of all, the Club faces the same problem as Arsenal, which is the
saturated football market. Nevertheless, the financial distress is the most serious
issue, because of the very high level of net debt, which in 2011/2012 was
366.000.00017. According to the Financial Times, in 2012 the Glazer Family, the
owners of Manchester United, had difficulties to refinance its debt18
. Moreover,
Bloomberg sustains that the MU has to face a big challenge, which is represented by
the high wages19.
Arsenals Opportunities
There are several opportunities that Arsenal can pursue. First of all, there are new
emergent football markets, such as China, India and United States, in which the
penetration could be very profitable. This purpose could be achieved also through an
increase in marketing and advertising campaign, in order to reach not only new
domestic supporters, but also to create loyalty in the farther countries. Concerning
*'The Guardian Website, www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2013/apr/18/premier-league-club-accounts-debt. Accessed 7
March 2014
*(Financial Time Website, www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/65b68d60-ff1b-11de-a677-00144feab49a.html#axzz33Taut66e. Accessed
7 March 2014
*)Bloomberg Website, www.bloomberg.com/quote/MANU:US. Accessed 7 March 2014
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
31/117
#*
football segment, an important chance is represented by the creation of satellite
teams, which would be extremely useful to better develop the youngest and most
talented players. Furthermore, this strategy could help Arsenal to create coalitions
with other European important teams, in order to have preferential channels during
the negotiation periods. Besides, also the UEFA Financial Fair Play could be
conceived as a great opportunity, due to the fact that Arsenal has a strong financial
position compared to its main competitors.
Manchester Uniteds Opportunities
Generally, MUs opportunities are very similar to the Arsenals ones, especially
regarding the penetration of new emergent markets and the coalitions with other
clubs. Probably, an extremely important chance could be represented by the potential
expansion of its brand equity through more advertising and visibility. We cannot
assume the same in the matter of UEFA Financial Fair Play, as its debt position it is
not as strong as the one of Arsenal.
Arsenals Threats
There are some critical threats that Arsenal has to deal with. First of all, the Firms
strategy, which consists of selling the best players, could lead to a failure in reaching
the qualification in the Champions League and to a loss of interest from its
supporters. Nonetheless, the generational turnover in the Arsenal management could
put the leadership of the Club in the hands of less competent people, which may led
to future problems regarding the management of the players and the budget in an
efficient way. All these factors, combined with a challenging and dynamic
environment, could raise the possibility of financial risk.
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
32/117
#"
Manchester Uniteds Threats
The threats that Manchester United has to face are, in a certain way, different from
the ones of Arsenal, as MU competes with the richest clubs in the world, in order to
buy out the best players. The high level of the competition contributes to raise the
players transfer fees, and, thus, the financial debt, in which the Club incurs. The
increase in fees is accompanied by an increase in wages for all the other players,
which could lead to some problems between them and the management.
Through this SWOT analysis, we had demonstrated that the strategy implemented by
Arsenal is oriented towards the right direction, especially with respect to the
Financial Fair Play, which could be an important driver to exploit for the future
competitive advantage and to increase its stream of revenues. These profits may
derive from the new Stadium, but also from a careful policy of player management
which allows the Club to maintain a relatively restrained salary cap by focusing on
young and talented players and selling them at very high prices when they are at the
top of their careers. Furthermore, Arsenal can leverage on marketing and advertising
campaigns, by strengthening the brand awareness and increasing the brand equity.
However, a possible future development could involve a refocusing upwards in the
strategy about the sports performance. In order to make this scenario achievable, a
feasible solution may be to emulate the Manchester Uniteds model, which means
the retaining of the best players, the increase of the brand equity and being
competitive to the top levels. Nevertheless, to achieve this aim the Club should take
care of the financial position by finding additional sources of revenues, which are no
longer provided by player trading. For instance, they could come from the Stadium
or from new summer tournaments in emerging markets. In order to deeply
understand some possible future strategies we developed them in a crossed SWOT.
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
33/117
##
Internal
External
Strengths Weaknesses
Opportunities
Penetrate new emerging
football markets (India, China
and USA) in order to
strengthen the Brand Name to
marketing and merchandising.
Financial stability in short and
long-term joint with positive
free cash flow and high quality
resources in order to fit with
UEFA Financial Fair play.
Importance of Emirates in
order to build a new supporter
base.
Stable and competent
management could allow the
creation of a long-term
coalition with other important
European clubs.
Penetrating new markets in
order to search better sponsors
given the great ability of the
club in managing them.
Increasing marketing and
advertising in order to support the
club strategy of high tickets cost.
Entering in new emerging markets
in order to overcome the maturity
stage faced by the English football
market, and at the same time
searching new private investors.
Fighting the tendency to not win
trophies and the club strategy to sell
its champions creating satelliteteams in order to improve the best
young players.
Signing long-term contract,
covering the investment in the new
stadium, in order to fit with UEFA
Financial Fair Play regulation.
Threats
Facing the challenging and
dynamic environment thanks
to the strong Brand Name
developed through
merchandising and marketing.
Strong revenues deriving from
the advanced Emirates
Stadium and from the ability
in managing sponsors can be
used in order to avoid the
financial risk due to the long-
term loan.
Relying on the high
supporters loyalty in order to
avoid to stop watching
matches although the selling
of the most important players.
Financial and management
stability, and the almost
always positive free cash
flows are important drivers in
order to avoid future problems
in to managing players and
budget, facing a challenging
and dynamic environment due
also to the financial risk.
Trying to win trophies and
qualifying to UEFA ChampionsLeague in order to avoid the
financial impact on the performance
of the Club.
Searching new ways to grow in the
English football market in order to
face the challenging and dynamic
environment.
Trying to focus on very strong new
young talents in order to overcome
the problem of selling the best and
most important players, risking not
qualifying to UEFA Champions
League.
Searching new private investors inorder to avoid future problems for
management, financial risk and
challenging and dynamic
environment.
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
34/117
#$
1.1.4 Arsenals Porters Value Chain Analysis
Now that we have developed some of the possible strategies that Arsenal could
implement, we would like to focus on another decision support tool, the Porters
Value Chain. This is a chain of activities, divided in primary and support activities,
which the Club performs in order to create and distribute its products (Michael
Porter, 1985).
Figure 1Porters Value Chain Analysis
Source: Manage 12 Website
Primary Activities
Inbound Logistics: it refers to the purchasing of players and the hiring and
training of the Clubs staff.
Operations: it concerns the creation of a direct TV Channel specifically for
the Club, which is named Arsenal TV. Furthermore, it includes the
establishment of a Membership Club that can also be as a Credit Card, in
order to connect also the financial activities.
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
35/117
#%
Outbound Logistics: it consists of Official Stores where Supporters can buy
Arsenal F.C.s gadgets. In this primary activity are involved both the selling
of the day and the season tickets.
Marketing and Sales: the main way to promote the Club through the
supporters is to create a brand image, through which their loyalty is
strengthened. Other fundamental points are: merchandising, the selling of TV
rights and the attraction of new and profitable sponsors.
Service: All the facilities offered by the Emirates Stadium (i.e. restaurants,
coffees, the commercial center and the Premium Service) are connected to
this activity. Another important service is the official website, where all the
official communications are written.
SUPPORT ACTIVITIES
Firm Infrastructure: there are two kinds of infrastructures: the Emirates
Stadium and the new luxury apartments arisen out of the old Highbury.
Human Resources Management: the two main sources for this category are
represented by the creation of a network of talent scouts around the world and
by the employment of expert managers, such as Arsne Wenger, who are able
to identify and acquiring the right players.Another fundamental source is the
youth players academy.
Technology: the selling of official gadgets is extended also to the web
through the Clubs official website, which exploits the new trend of e-
commerce. A statistical analysis of each match is also published online.
Procurement: is the ways in which are managed all the operations connected
to acquisitions of players, merchandising and sponsorships.
It is clear therefore that the Firm Infrastructure and the Human Resources
Management are the most critical activities, as they lead to sustainability of the
business in the long run. Consequently, the Stadium and the managerial abilities to
recruit and retain the best resources are important sources of revenues. As well as
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
36/117
#&
Marketing and Sales, since it may increase the brand equity and the money deriving
from TV rights.
1.1.5 Arsenals BCG Matrix
BCG Matrix is a strategic planning tool, which could be useful to study the business
opportunities in term of Relative Market Share and Market Growth Rate(Henderson,
Bruce D., 1968). In our analysis, we are not going not consider the product lines, but
we will focus on geographical markets: England, Asia, India and America.
Figure 2:Arsenals BCG Matrix
Source: Manage 12 Website and Personal Elaboration
England
In this moment the core market is the UK, which contributes for the 95%(Arsenal
Holdings plc, 2013) of the total revenues, including day-match, membership,
sponsorship and TV rights. Therefore, the English Market is the more profitable one,
which is sustaining the entire society, as the market share is very high. Nevertheless,
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
37/117
#'
it is a relatively mature market with a very low growth, due to the fact that it has an
established customer basis with low chance of change (supporters loyalty).
Asia
The Asian market is potentially the best one to penetrate, as its growth rate is the
highest. In this market the Arsenals position is very strong, due to the creation of
coalitions with some important Asian companies, such as Bodog, which operates in
the online gaming. This partnership has been arranged during the Asian pre-season
tour to Indonesia, Vietnam and Japan made by the Club in 201320. These features
make the increase in market share with a great Asian fan base and popularity post-
tour possible. Asia represents a strategically important region, since it gives the
opportunity to develop marketing initiatives and consumer promotions, by seeing the
team playing and by providing a further engagement for future perspectives.
India
The current population of India in 2014 is estimated to be 1.27 billion 21. Therefore,
thanks to the fact that a wealthy target audience pertaining to the middle class is
becoming increasingly interested in football, this industry has a great potential of
growth. The opportunities in this market are represented by the potential commercial
partnership with local companies, the chance to improve the Indian football and
strengthen the image of the Club through the Corporate Social Responsibility.
20
Arsenal Website, www.arsenal.com/news/news-archive/club-welcomes-bodog-as-official-partner. Accessed 11 March 201421India Online Website, www.indiaonlinepages.com/population/india-current-population.html. Accessed 11 March 2014
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
38/117
#(
The USA
The growth of the American market is fairly low, since the American customers are
keener on other sports: NBA, MLB, NFL and NHL. For this reason, the Major
League Soccer (MLS) is not really popular. Nevertheless, there are some ways that
may be used to enhance the number of the supporters, such as through pre-season
tournaments and Clubs megastores in the major cities.
Concluding the Arsenals BCG Matrix analysis, we can assume that the crucial
market is the England one, as it represents the most important source of revenues
with the greatest part of market share. However, we had demonstrated that the best
market opportunities can be exploited in Asia, since this area has a very high Market
Growth Rate, through partnerships and pre-season tournaments, which could be used
to increase supporters fan base.
1.1.6 Managerial Analysis Conclusions
At the end of this managerial analysis we can draw some conclusions. First of all, we
can affirm that Arsenal F.C. owns some critical assets, such as Management and the
Emirates Stadium, which in the long-term can lead to a competitive advantage. As a
matter of fact, its strategy is focused on the long-term, with financial solidity, and on
the development of young talented players, trying, at the same time, to remain
competitive on the field. Another central point is the exploitation of new
opportunities, such as emerging markets and a significant attention on marketing and
advertising in order to increase the supporters fan base and the brand equity.
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
39/117
#)
1.2 ARSENAL F.C. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
In this section we are going to focus on the financial evaluation of Arsenal Holdings
plc, which is, as we mentioned above, the holding of Arsenal Football Club. There
are two main segments in which the holding operates: the football business and the
property segment (associated with the sales of the flats and the apartments of
Highbury Square, Drayton Park and Queensland Road). Even in this case, we found
necessary to perform a comparison with Manchester United. An important premise
we have to state is that Manchester United plc has not a property segment, but only a
football one. The aim of this analysis is to understand how strong and solid the
financial health of Arsenal is, with respect to the milestone of the English football.
1.2.1 Profitability Analysis
We are going to start from the Profitability Analysis, taking in consideration
Revenues and Profits before Taxes and Interests of Arsenal and Manchester United
from 2011 to 2013.
Graph 1: Revenues trend 2011-2013
Source: Annual Reports Arsenal Holdings plc, 2011-2013, and Manchester United plc, 2011-2013
-
50.000.000
100.000.000
150.000.000
200.000.000
250.000.000
300.000.000
350.000.000
400.000.000
2011 2012 2013
Arsenal vs. MU's Revenues
Arsenal's Revenues
Manchester United's
Revenues
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
40/117
$+
Graph 1 reveals that the revenues had a variable trend both for Arsenal and
Manchester United, due to the different impacts of the main drivers of income.
Concerning Arsenal, from 2011 to 2012 revenues had decreased, as the level of sales
activity in the property business was reduced, with Highbury Square almost
completely sold. The group commercial capabilities were enhanced in the recent
year, thanks to the huge investments of the owners, but the revenues deriving from
the commercial activities in 2012 were not enough to cover the decline into the
property segment. Whereas in 2013 the growth in the commercial revenues increased
and, at the same time, the property segment had a revival thanks to the construction
of new buildings, such as the three towers of market residential accommodations in
the northeast section of Queensland Road. For these reasons the total Group
Turnover raised from 243.013.000 in 2012 to 280.374.000 in 2013(Arsenal
Holdings plc, 2013).
Manchester Uniteds revenues were very high with 363.189.000 (Manchester
United plc, 2013) in 2013. The decrease of income from 2011 to 2012 was mainly
due to broadcasting and match-day revenues, whose decline exceeded the increase in
commercial revenues. The increase from 2012 to 2013 derived almost entirely from
the commercial boom, about 30% (Manchester United plc, 2013) of change from
the previous year (thanks to several new sponsorship partners).
By comparing the two clubs, it appears evident that Manchester Uniteds revenues
were higher than Arsenals one. As a matter of fact, although Arsenals revenues
were enhanced by the property segment, Manchester United could rely on a huge
brand awareness, which can attract much more sponsors.
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
41/117
$*
Graph 2: Profits trend 2011-2013
Source: Annual Reports Arsenal Holdings plc, 2011-2013
Graph 2 shows the EBIT of the Group for financial years 2011, 2012 and 2013. The
Blue bar represents the profit before interests and taxes, the red one the EBIT
without player trading and the green one the EBIT except the disposals of player
registrations.
As we can observe, the nature of the profits has dramatically changed in the last
years. As a matter of fact, in 2011, the influence of the property segment was very
high, involving the final phase of the sale of the apartments in Highbury Square. In
this year the player trading, which concerns all the income deriving from selling
players, the amortization of them and the costs of player registrations, had a negative
impact on the profit. This was due to the fact that increasing revenues deriving from
commercial and broadcasting partnership were not enough to cover the huge amount
of wage costs. Neither the profits of disposals coming from the player registrations,
which regard the transfer income of the sold players, were able to overcome these
expenses.
From 2012, the profits of the firm became more dependent on the player trading, in
particular on the profits deriving from disposals of player registrations. In fact, the
transfer window strictly influenced the increased profit before interests and taxes
-40.000.000
-30.000.000
-20.000.000
-10.000.000
-
10.000.000
20.000.000
30.000.000
40.000.000
50.000.000
60.000.000
2011 2012 2013
Arsenal's Profits Trend 2011-2013
Profits before taxes/
interests
Without player trading
Without disposal of
player registration
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
42/117
$"
with the major contributions coming from the sale of Cesc Fabregas, Samir Nasri and
Gael Clichy. This income made the Club able to cover the considerable increase in
the wage costs and the shortage of revenues deriving from property segment.
From the Chart is evident that in 2013 profits decreased. The main reasons stand in
the fact that the profit on disposals of player registrations (46.986.000) was lower
than the previous year (65.456.000)(Arsenal Holdings plc, 2013). Furthermore, the
costs of the player contracts were increased. The major contribution derived from the
transfer out of Robin Van Persie and Alex Song. In this year, the wages rose by
7,70% (Arsenal Holdings plc, 2013) and also the other operating expenses are
extremely large, representing a great share of total revenues. An important issue is
that the player trading did not deeply affect the profits, since, as we stated before, the
property segment had a new development. Nevertheless, EBIT is still positive, thus
profitability is a strength of the Club.
Graph 3: EBIT trend 2011-2013
Source: Annual Reports Arsenal Holdings plc 2011-2013, and Manchester United plc, 2011-2013
Considering MU, as you can see from Graph 3, EBIT sharply decreased, due to the
huge growth of operating expenses, especially in football player and staff
compensation. Instead, in 2013, the boost in commercial revenues was able to
-
10.000.000
20.000.000
30.000.000
40.000.000
50.000.000
60.000.000
70.000.000
2011 2012 2013
Arsenal vs. MU's Profits
Arsenal's Profits before
Taxes and Interests
Manchester United's
Profits before Taxes and
Interests
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
43/117
$#
compensate for this increase in costs. In general, during the contemplated period, we
can assume that Manchester Uniteds profits were higher than the Arsenals ones,
with the exception of 2012. As a matter of fact, in this year, Arsenal had an
extraordinary income due to some of its best players selling.
It must therefore be recognised that MU has a higher capacity to produce income,
although its costs are massive. The main reason of this ability is the awareness of the
club, which allows to generate an incredible stream of commercial revenues. On the
contrary, Arsenal is strictly dependent on the player trading, which granted a less
stable stream of revenues, as well as income deriving from the property segment.
1.2.2 Liquidity and Efficiency Analysis
We are going to undertake the Liquidity Analysis for both Arsenal and Manchester
United, in order to measure the availability of cash to repay the debts. We are going
to make the Efficiency Analysis only for Arsenal, to highlight the property segment,
which Manchester United does not have.
Graph 4: Current and Quick Ratio
Source: Annual Report Arsenal Holdings plc 2011-2013, and Manchester United plc 2011-2013
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
1,4
1,6
1,8
2
2011 2012 2013
Arsenal vs. MU's Current and Quick Ratio
Arsenal's Current Ratio
Arsenal's Quick Ratio
Manchester United's
Current Ratio
Manchester United's
Quick Ratio
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
44/117
$$
The Current Ratio measures ability of the company to pay short-term obligations
with short-term assets22. You can notice that this ratio is greater than 1 for Arsenal,
in all the three years that we analyzed, thus Arsenal Holdings plc had enough
liquidity to meet its current debt and its capital expenses. These results could be
reached also without taking into account their inventories. Therefore, we calculated
also the Quick Ratio, whose trend is illustrated in Graph 4. As you can see, also this
ratio is greater than 1. The values of the Current Ratio and the Quick Ratio did not
diverge too much; therefore, this demonstrates that the company is not dependent in
their inventories.
Manchester Uniteds situation was different. As a matter of fact, the Current Ratio
and the Quick Ratio were very low, smaller than 1. This means that Manchester
United had problems covering its short-term liabilities with cash. These values were
very similar and the explanation for this could be that MU does not have a property
segment and, thus, has a very small inventory.
Concluding, we can assert that Arsenal, in contrast to United, being able to cover its
debts, is always more cautious in the short-term.
Graph 5: Debtor Collection Period; Stock Holding Period, Creditor Collection Period, and Working Capital Cycle.
Source: Annual Report Arsenal Holdings plc 2011-2013
22Investopedia Website, www.investopedia.com/terms/c/currenratio.asp. Accessed 14 March 2014
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
DCP SHP CCP WCC
DCP, SHP, CCP and WCC
2011
2012
2013
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
45/117
$%
The Working Capital Cycle (WCC) measures the amount of time between the
moment in which a business starts to invest and the moment in which the business
get paid23
. Arsenal Holdings plc was not able to manage efficiently the cash flows.
As a matter of fact, WCC is quite high. In 2011 and 2012, this is mainly due to the
Stock Holding Period (SHP), that is an index, which measures the average time that
an item is on stock24
. The main part of the stocks consists of the property segment. In
2013, SHP dropped dramatically, as almost every property of Highbury Square had
been sold. In spite of this, WCC in 2013 was not reduced. This is due to the Debtor
Collection Period (DCP) that increased fivefold from 2011. DCP is an index that
measures the average time taken to collect trade debts25. The reasons of this growth
stand in the fact that clubs, which buy players from Arsenal F.C., are not able to pay
them in a short range of time. The Concerning Creditor Collection Period (CCP)26
,
which is the average time taken to pay off trade creditors, is relatively low because
Arsenal Holdings plc is quite fast in its payment. Nevertheless, in general, the trend
is negative and the Club is losing efficiency.
1.2.3
Cash Flow Analysis
A Cash Flow Analysis is needed as it describes the movement of the money in a
specific business during a certain period of time. It could be an important driver in
order to understand the long-term capacity to invest of the Clubs. Even in this case,
we decided to make a comparison between Arsenal and Manchester United.
23Divestopedia Website, www.divestopedia.com/definitio/1234/working-capital-cycle-wcc. Accessed 14 March 2014
24Investopedia Website, www.investopedia.com/terms/h/holdingperiod.asp. Accessed 14 March 2014
25Investopedia Website, www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debtor_collection_period. Accessed 14 March 2014
26Wiki Answers Website, www.wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_Creditors_Collection_Period?#slide=3. Accessed 14 March
2014
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
46/117
$&
Graph 6: Operating Cash Flow
Source: Annual Reports Arsenal Holdings plc, 2011-2013, and Manchester United plc, 2011-2013
You can notice from Graph 6 that Arsenals Operating Cash Flow is always positive,
thus there is enough cash-in, in order to cover cash outlays in the long run. The
reduction in 2012 was mainly due to the lack of sales in the property segment.
Whereas, in 2013 there was an increase. The principal reason of this growth lies in
the sales of the new buildings in the northeast section of Queensland Road. Property
segment plays a crucial role in the Arsenal ability to repay its liabilities.
Manchester Uniteds Operating Cash Flow from 2012 had a continuous increase due
mainly to the Commercial revenues that were primarily sponsorship firms, thus
money in. Manchester United was able to recover from the difficulties faced in 2011.
However, Arsenals position was more stable from the financial point of view.
-60.000.000
-40.000.000
-20.000.000
-
20.000.000
40.000.000
60.000.000
80.000.000
2011 2012 2013
Arsenal vs. MU's Operating CF
Arsenal's Operating Cash
Flow
Manchester United's
Operating Cash Flow
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
47/117
$'
Graph 7: Free Cash Flow
Source: Annual Report Arsenal Holdings plc 2011-2013, and Manchester United plc 2011-2013
The Arsenals trend of Free Cash Flow follows the one of Operating Cash Flow, with
a strong decrease in 2012 (first negative FCF since 2004), and an increase in 2013.
Manchester United was very good into reduce damage, with a very little amount of
loss in 2013.
Graph 8: Financing Cash Flow
Source: Annual Report Arsenal Holdings plc 2011-2013, and Manchester United plc 2011-2013
Concerning Financing Arsenals Cash Flow is almost constant and negative in all the
three years. The drop in Cash Flows in the last years is affecting the current capacity
-80.000.000
-60.000.000
-40.000.000
-20.000.000
-
20.000.000
40.000.000
60.000.000
2011 2012 2013
Arsenal vs. MU's Free CF
Arsenal's Free Cash
Flow
Manchester United's Free
Cash Flow
-50.000.000
-40.000.000
-30.000.000
-20.000.000
-10.000.000
-
10.000.000
20.000.000
30.000.000
40.000.000
50.000.000
60.000.000
2011 2012 2013
Arsenal vs. MU's Financing CF
Arsenal Financing Cash
Flow
Manchester United's
Financing Cash Flow
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
48/117
$(
to invest. Manchester Uniteds Financing Cash Flow in 2012 was negative due to the
repurchasing of senior secured notes in open market transaction and the payment of
dividends.
However, in general, Arsenal Holding plc has a strong financial position with
positive Cash Flows in order to cover liabilities, but it should develop new future
strategies in order not to comprise its future ability to invest. In contrast, Manchester
United has not the same solidity although it is trying to recover from this situation.
1.2.4
Arsenals Possible Future Prospect and Conclusion
Arsenal is becoming more influenced from the football segment, because the great
part of the apartments in Highbury Square is already sold. Nevertheless the property
segment is, however, critical. In fact the development of new constructions in the
surrounding area could lead to a further increase of revenues. Moreover, in order to
remain in a competitive position Arsenal has to manage in a smart way the
broadcasting and commercial revenues. In this direction Emirates and Arsenal F.C.
recently announced a new partnerships deal (150 million) for 5 years. They
renewed also the naming right agreement of the Stadium that will be called Emirates
Stadium until 2028. Concerning the technical sponsor Arsenal F.C. signed Puma as
replacement kit supplier for Nike with a 150 million five-years kit deal (the largest
in Premier League History).
The new FIFA Financial Fair Play regulation could strengthen the Clubs
competitive position, because it is a healthy society from the financial point of view
as opposed to other important Football Clubs (i.e. Manchester United). The main
risks stand in:
The sports performance of the team, concerning especially the participation
in the UEFA Champions League (granting visibility and huge revenues);
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
49/117
$)
The new football trend of private investors investing a lot of money into
clubs, increasing acquisition costs of players and wages. However, Financial
Fair Play regulation is going to mitigate this risk.
Concluding, we can say that, in the long-term, Arsenal has a good potential derived
from its financial solidity and strong bases for the development of enlightened future
strategies. However, a refocus in strategy toward the top, through the retaining of its
best players should be handled with some care. In fact, although could lead to better
sports performances, may also result into a position of financial distress that would
produce the opposite outcome. These are the basis on which we have decided to
develop the last two scenarios of the Decision Making Analysis.
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
50/117
%+
2 THE WAY TO EMIRATES STADIUM
Football business is a growing industry, even if it is now reaching the maturity phase.
The success of the clubs has attracted fans and sponsors, but, at the same time, it
created new challenges (i.e. the increased costs of players acquisitions, wages and
financial pressure due to the new FIFAs rules). For these reasons, the clubs have to
search new opportunities, in order to gain additional revenues. In this regard, a
critical role could be played by an owned stadium.
2.1 OVERVIEW OF EUROPEAN STADIUMS
As we mentioned in the first chapter, there are only few clubs, which have the power
to control the football market. 10% of clubs gain about 70% of the total income
(KPMG, 2011: 6). These clubs belong to the top-five leagues in Europe: Premier
League (England), Bundesliga (Germany), Liga (Spain), Serie A (Italy), and Ligue 1
(France). The main reason of this feature stands in the dimension and consumer
power of these countries.
Figure 3: Revenue distribution by country (2009/10 season)
Source: UEFA, KPMG Analysis, 2011
There are three sources of revenue: match-day revenues, broadcasting revenues and
other sources, such as the commercial one. Looking at Figure 3, we can assume that,
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
51/117
%*
on average, 21% of the incomes of the big-five leagues are generated by the match-
day revenues. In general, this data are highly influenced by the quality of the
stadiums. Therefore, the building of an up-to-date stadium is a crucial factor for a
team, which should choose the right strategy in order to satisfy the market needs with
the correct size and design.
Figure 4: Key Stadium data of the top European Clubs ranked by stadium capacity (season 2010/11)
(1) Manchester Uniteds stadium was rebuilt after being bombed during the WWII.
(2) Hamburger SVs stadium was rebuilt in 1998 at the same location where the previous one stood.
(3) In 2010/2011 Juventus F.C. the Stadio Olimpico as a temporary home whilst building the new 41.000-seat stadium.
Source: Clubs Homepages, KPMG Analysis, 2011
The field performance is deeply influenced by the financial one and a stadium is a
significant element if the club wants to have a competitive advantage over the others.
As a matter of facts, the old stadiums are not developed with the right features to
generate profits, since evidences demonstrate that the construction of a new owned
stadium, with modern design and facilities, improves the chance for the clubs to gain
money(KPMG, 2011: 10).
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
52/117
%"
Figure 5: Ownership map of stadiums in Europe in 2010
Source: UEFA, KPMG Analysis, 2011
At this moment, the majority of the stadiums ownership in Europe is held by public
entities, although the new sectors trend goes towards privatization. Therefore, the
most important clubs are trying to build their own stadium to retain all the revenues
deriving from the match-days. These top clubs manage this asset through
professionals, producing very huge revenues in comparison with the ones that do not
own a stadium.
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
53/117
%#
Figure 6:Revenue generation in the top European clubs stadium (2009/2010)
Source: Deloitte Football Money League 2011, KPMG Analysis, 2011
Figure 6 reveals that there are several clubs that are able to gain a greater share of
their total revenues from the match-day than others. They are successful in affecting
the prices of the tickets, the sponsorship policy and the sport performance. Arsenal
F.C. is the first ranked team, as it generates 42% of its income from match-day. This
result is strongly dependent on the construction of the Emirates Stadium. As a matter
of fact, the ownership structure of the stadium, the performance of the club, the size,
age and the design of the structure are critical factors in terms of revenues generation
(KPMG, 2011: 12).
The analysis in Figure 6 shows that there is an opposite trend between English,
German and Spanish clubs, which usually have the ownership of their stadiums. On
the other hand, Italian and French clubs do not possess the stadiums and, as a result,
they gain less money. Stadiums owned by private entities, produce more income
mainly because they have been built recently, so the clubs focused more on the
business needs. In contrast, the ones owned by public entities are extremely old and
designed without taking into account the current needs of the market, but tailored for
specific events (Olympic Games). New stadiums should be thought by calibrating the
8/11/2019 The Decision Making Process Behind the Choice of Emirates Stadium (Il processo decisionale alla base della scelta
54/117
%$
right capacity and utilization in order to fill them, but also keeping high the ticket
price.
The English Premier League and the German Bundesliga have an extremely high
capacity utilization (relatively 92% and 88%). As we already mentioned, the quality
of a stadium is critical to attract supporters and not only for the performance of the
team on the field. In contrast, the Italian Serie A, in spite of a very high quality of the
played football, has a very low utilization rate (61%), due to the fact that the
stadiums are obsolete(KPMG, 2011: 15). The main features to built a modern
stadium, which can grant the generation of further income, are: all covered seats, a
corporate box, a loge box, premium seating, exclusive corporate tier, restaurants and
bars, high-end catering, official stores, museum, hotels and a retractable roof. As a
matter of fact, there are some rules, for reasons concerning safety and security, which
require that all the supporters have to be seated. Moreover, the presence of premium
seats grants higher ticket prices and restaurants, bars, stores and the museums lead to
additional revenues. Furthermore, there is a strong source of commercial